@article {KNZ002004, title = {Nutrient addition increases grassland sensitivity to droughts}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {101}, year = {2020}, pages = {e02981}, abstract = {

Grasslands worldwide are expected to experience an increase in extreme events such as drought, along with simultaneous increases in mineral nutrient inputs as a result of human industrial activities. These changes are likely to interact because elevated nutrient inputs may alter plant diversity and increase the sensitivity to droughts. Dividing a system\’s sensitivity to drought into resistance to change during the drought and rate of recovery after the drought generates insights into different dimensions of the system\’s resilience in the face of drought. Here, we examine the effects of experimental nutrient fertilization and the resulting diversity loss on the resistance to and recovery from severe regional droughts. We do this at 13 North American sites spanning gradients of aridity, five annual grasslands in California, and eight perennial grasslands in the Great Plains. We measured rate of resistance as the change in annual aboveground biomass (ANPP) per unit change in growing season precipitation as conditions declined from normal to drought. We measured recovery as the change in ANPP during the postdrought period and the return to normal precipitation. Resistance and recovery did not vary across the 400-mm range of mean growing season precipitation spanned by our sites in the Great Plains. However, chronic nutrient fertilization in the Great Plains reduced drought resistance and increased drought recovery. In the California annual grasslands, arid sites had a greater recovery postdrought than mesic sites, and nutrient addition had no consistent effects on resistance or recovery. Across all study sites, we found that predrought species richness in natural grasslands was not consistently associated with rates of resistance to or recovery from the drought, in contrast to earlier findings from experimentally assembled grassland communities. Taken together, these results suggest that human-induced eutrophication may destabilize grassland primary production, but the effects of this may vary across regions and flora, especially between perennial and annual-dominated grasslands.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1002/ecy.2981}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ecy.2981}, author = {Bharath, Siddharth and E.T. Borer and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and Fay, Philip A. and Gherardi, Laureano A. and Knops, Johannes M. H. and Leakey, Andrew D. B. and Yahdjian, Laura and Seabloom, Eric W.} } @article {KNZ001983, title = {Shifts in plant functional composition following long-term drought in grasslands}, journal = {Journal of Ecology}, volume = {107}, year = {2019}, pages = {2133 - 2148}, abstract = {

\ 1. Plant traits can provide unique insights into plant performance at the community scale. Functional composition, defined by both functional diversity and community-weighted trait means (CWMs), can affect the stability of above-ground net primary production (ANPP) in response to climate extremes. Further complexity arises, however, when functional composition itself responds to environmental change. The duration of climate extremes, such as drought, is expected to increase with rising global temperatures; thus, understanding the impacts of long-term drought on functional composition and the corresponding effect that has on ecosystem function could improve predictions of ecosystem sensitivity to climate change.
\ 2. We experimentally reduced growing season precipitation by 66\% across six temperate grasslands for 4 years and measured changes in three indices of functional diversity (functional dispersion, richness and evenness), community-weighted trait means and phylogenetic diversity (PD). Specific leaf area (SLA), leaf nitrogen content (LNC) and (at most sites) leaf turgor loss point (πTLP) were measured for species cumulatively representing ~90\% plant cover at each site.
\ 3. Long-term drought led to increased community functional dispersion in three sites, with negligible effects on the remaining sites. Species re-ordering following the mortality/senescence of dominant species was the main driver of increased functional dispersion. The response of functional diversity was not consistently matched by changes in phylogenetic diversity. Community-level drought strategies (assessed as CWMs) largely shifted from drought tolerance to drought avoidance and/or escape strategies, as evidenced by higher community-weighted πTLP, SLA and LNC. Lastly, ecosystem drought sensitivity (i.e. relative reduction in ANPP in drought plots) was positively correlated with community-weighted SLA and negatively correlated with functional diversity.
\ 4. Synthesis. Increased functional diversity following long-term drought may stabilize ecosystem functioning in response to future drought. However, shifts in community-scale drought strategies may increase ecosystem drought sensitivity, depending on the nature and timing of drought. Thus, our results highlight the importance of considering both functional diversity and abundance-weighted traits means of plant communities as their collective effect may either stabilize or enhance ecosystem sensitivity to drought.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, ANPP, Climate change, community weighted traits, Drought, Functional diversity, plant functional traits}, doi = {10.1111/1365-2745.13252}, url = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.13252}, author = {Griffin-Nolan, Robert J. and D.M. Blumenthal and Scott. L. Collins and Farkas, Timothy E. and Hoffman, Ava M. and Mueller, Kevin E. and Ocheltree, Troy W. and M.D. Smith and Whitney, Kenneth D. and Alan K. Knapp}, editor = {Jones, Holly} } @article {KNZ001712, title = {Drivers of variation in aboveground net primary productivity and plant community composition differ across a broad precipitation gradient}, journal = {Ecosystems}, volume = {19}, year = {2016}, pages = {521-533}, abstract = {

Aboveground net primary production (ANPP) is a key integrator of C uptake and energy flow in many terrestrial ecosystems. As such, ecologists have long sought to understand the factors driving variation in this important ecosystem process. Although total annual precipitation has been shown to be a strong predictor of ANPP in grasslands across broad spatial scales, it is often a poor predictor at local scales. Here we examine the amount of variation in ANPP that can be explained by total annual precipitation versus precipitation during specific periods of the year (precipitation periods) and nutrient availability at three sites representing the major grassland types (shortgrass steppe, mixed-grass prairie, and tallgrass prairie) spanning the broad precipitation gradient of the U.S. Central Great Plains. Using observational data, we found that precipitation periods and nutrient availability were much stronger predictors of site-level ANPP than total annual precipitation. However, the specific nutrients and precipitation periods that best predicted ANPP differed among the three sites. These effects were mirrored experimentally at the shortgrass and tallgrass sites, with precipitation and nutrient availability co-limiting ANPP, but not at the mixed-grass site, where nutrient availability determined ANPP exclusive of precipitation effects. Dominant grasses drove the ANPP response to increased nutrient availability at all three sites. However, the relative responses of rare grasses and forbs were greater than those of the dominant grasses to experimental nutrient additions, thus potentially driving species turnover with chronic nutrient additions. This improved understanding of the factors driving variation in ANPP within ecosystems spanning the broad precipitation gradient of the Great Plains will aid predictions of alterations in ANPP under future global change scenarios.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, dominant species, Great Plains, Nutrient Network (NutNet), nutrients, precipitation periods, rare species}, doi = {10.1007/s10021-015-9949-7}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007\%2Fs10021-015-9949-7}, author = {Kimberly J. La Pierre and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Klein, J.A. and M.D. Smith} } @article {KNZ001788, title = {Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients}, journal = {Nature Plants}, volume = {1}, year = {2015}, pages = {15080}, abstract = {

Terrestrial ecosystem productivity is widely accepted to be nutrient limited1. Although nitrogen (N) is deemed a key determinant of aboveground net primary production (ANPP)2,3, the prevalence of co-limitation by N and phosphorus (P) is increasingly recognized4,​5,​6,​7,​8. However, the extent to which terrestrial productivity is co-limited by nutrients other than N and P has remained unclear. Here, we report results from a standardized factorial nutrient addition experiment, in which we added N, P and potassium (K) combined with a selection of micronutrients (K+μ), alone or in concert, to 42 grassland sites spanning five continents, and monitored ANPP. Nutrient availability limited productivity at 31 of the 42 grassland sites. And pairwise combinations of N, P, and K+μ co-limited ANPP at 29 of the sites. Nitrogen limitation peaked in cool, high latitude sites. Our findings highlight the importance of less studied nutrients, such as K and micronutrients, for grassland productivity, and point to significant variations in the type and degree of nutrient limitation. We suggest that multiple-nutrient constraints must be considered when assessing the ecosystem-scale consequences of nutrient enrichment.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/nplants.2015.80}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nplants201580}, author = {Fay, P.A. and Prober, S.M. and Harpole, W.S. and Knops, J.M.H. and J.D. Bakker and E.T. Borer and Lind, E.M. and MacDougall, A.S. and Seabloom, E.W. and Wragg, P.D. and P. Adler and D.M. Blumenthal and Buckley, Y.M. and Chu, C. and Cleland, E.E. and Scott. L. Collins and Davies, K.F. and G. Du and Feng, X. and Firn, J. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Hautier, Y. and Heckman, R.W. and Jin, V.L. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J. and L. Ladwig and Li, Q. and McCulley, R.L. and Melbourne, B.A. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and A. Risch and sch{\"u}tz, M. and Stevens, C.J. and Wedin, D.A. and Yang, L.H.} } @article {KNZ001697, title = {Plant species{\textquoteright} origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {6}, year = {2015}, pages = {7710 -}, abstract = {

Exotic species dominate many communities; however the functional significance of species\’ biogeographic origin remains highly contentious. This debate is fuelled in part by the lack of globally replicated, systematic data assessing the relationship between species provenance, function and response to perturbations. We examined the abundance of native and exotic plant species at 64 grasslands in 13 countries, and at a subset of the sites we experimentally tested native and exotic species responses to two fundamental drivers of invasion, mineral nutrient supplies and vertebrate herbivory. Exotic species are six times more likely to dominate communities than native species. Furthermore, while experimental nutrient addition increases the cover and richness of exotic species, nutrients decrease native diversity and cover. Native and exotic species also differ in their response to vertebrate consumer exclusion. These results suggest that species origin has functional significance, and that eutrophication will lead to increased exotic dominance in grasslands.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, Biological sciences, ecology, Plant sciences}, doi = {10.1038/ncomms8710}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms8710}, author = {Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Buckley, Y. and Cleland, E.E. and Davies, K.F. and Firn, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Lind, E. and MacDougall, A.S. and Orrock, J.L. and Prober, S.M. and P. Adler and Anderson, T.M. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Cadotte, M. and Chu, C. and Cottingham, K.L. and Crawley, M.J. and Damschen, E.I. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and CeCrappeo, N.M. and G. Du and Fay, P.A. and Frater, P. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Hector, A. and Hillebrand, H. and Hofmockel, K.S. and Humphries, H.C. and Jin, V.L. and Kay, A.D. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and L. Ladwig and Lambrinos, J.G. and Li, Q. and Li, W. and Marushia, R.} } @article {KNZ001793, title = {Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {508}, year = {2014}, pages = {517 - 520}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/nature13144}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13144}, author = {E.T. Borer and Seabloom, E.W. and Gruner, D.S. and Harpole, W.S and Hillebrand, H. and Lind, E.M. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Anderson, T.M. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Buckley, Y.M. and Cadotte, M. and Chu, C. and Cleland, E.E. and Crawley, M.J. and Daleo, P. and Damschen, E.I. and Davies, K.F. and DeCrappeo, N.M. and G. Du and Firn, J. and Hautier, Y. and Heckman, R.W. and Hector, A. and HilleRisLambers, J. and Iribarne, Oscar and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Leakey, A.D.B. and Li, W. and MacDougall, A.S. and McCulley, R.L. and Melbourne, B.A. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore and Mortensen, B. and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and Orrock, J.L. and Pascual, J. and Prober, S.M. and Pyke, D.A. and A. Risch and Schuetz, M. and M.D. Smith and Stevens, C.J. and L.L. Sullivan and Williams, R.J. and Wragg, P.D. and Wright, J.P. and Yang, L.H.} } @article {KNZ001791, title = {Life-history constraints in grassland plant species: a growth-defence trade-off is the norm}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {16}, year = {2013}, pages = {513 - 521}, abstract = {

Plant growth can be limited by resource acquisition and defence against consumers, leading to contrasting trade-off possibilities. The competition-defence hypothesis posits a trade-off between competitive ability and defence against enemies (e.g. herbivores and pathogens). The growth-defence hypothesis suggests that strong competitors for nutrients are also defended against enemies, at a cost to growth rate. We tested these hypotheses using observations of 706 plant populations of over 500 species before and following identical fertilisation and fencing treatments at 39 grassland sites worldwide. Strong positive covariance in species responses to both treatments provided support for a growth-defence trade-off: populations that increased with the removal of nutrient limitation (poor competitors) also increased following removal of consumers. This result held globally across 4 years within plant life-history groups and within the majority of individual sites. Thus, a growth-defence trade-off appears to be the norm, and mechanisms maintaining grassland biodiversity may operate within this constraint.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/ele.12078}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ele.12078}, author = {Lind, E.M. and E.T. Borer and Seabloom, E. and P. Adler and J.D. Bakker and D.M. Blumenthal and Crawley, M. and Davies, K. and Firn, J. and Gruner, D.S. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Hillebrand, H. and Knops, J. and Melbourne, B. and Mortensen, B. and A. Risch and Schuetz, M. and Stevens, C. and Wragg, P.D.} } @article {KNZ001790, title = {Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?}, journal = {Global Change Biology}, volume = {19}, year = {2013}, pages = {3677 - 3687}, abstract = {

Invasions have increased the size of regional species pools, but are typically assumed to reduce native diversity. However, global-scale tests of this assumption have been elusive because of the focus on exotic species richness, rather than relative abundance. This is problematic because low invader richness can indicate invasion resistance by the native community or, alternatively, dominance by a single exotic species. Here, we used a globally replicated study to quantify relationships between exotic richness and abundance in grass-dominated ecosystems in 13 countries on six continents, ranging from salt marshes to alpine tundra. We tested effects of human land use, native community diversity, herbivore pressure, and nutrient limitation on exotic plant dominance. Despite its widespread use, exotic richness was a poor proxy for exotic dominance at low exotic richness, because sites that contained few exotic species ranged from relatively pristine (low exotic richness and cover) to almost completely exotic-dominated ones (low exotic richness but high exotic cover). Both exotic cover and richness were predicted by native plant diversity (native grass richness) and land use (distance to cultivation). Although climate was important for predicting both exotic cover and richness, climatic factors predicting cover (precipitation variability) differed from those predicting richness (maximum temperature and mean temperature in the wettest quarter). Herbivory and nutrient limitation did not predict exotic richness or cover. Exotic dominance was greatest in areas with low native grass richness at the site- or regional-scale. Although this could reflect native grass displacement, a lack of biotic resistance is a more likely explanation, given that grasses comprise the most aggressive invaders. These findings underscore the need to move beyond richness as a surrogate for the extent of invasion, because this metric confounds monodominance with invasion resistance. Monitoring species\&$\#$39; relative abundance will more rapidly advance our understanding of invasions.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/gcb.12370}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.12370}, author = {Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Buckley, Y. and Cleland, E.E. and Davies, K. and Firn, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Lind, E. and MacDougall, A. and Orrock, J.L. and Prober, S.M. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Anderson, M.T. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Caldeira, M. and Chu, C. and Crawley, M.J. and Daleo, P. and Damschen, E.I. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and DeCrappeo, N.M. and Dickman, C.R. and G. Du and Fay, P.A. and Frater, P. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Hector, A. and Helm, A. and Hillebrand, H. and Hofmockel, K.S. and Humphries, H.C. and Iribarne, O. and Jin, V.L. and Kay, A. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and L. Ladwig and Lambrinos, J.G. and Leakey, A.D.B. and Li, Q. and Li, W. and McCulley, R. and Melbourne, B. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and Mortensen, B. and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and P{\"a}rtel, M. and Pascual, J and Pyke, D.A. and A. Risch and Salguero-Gomez, R. and Sankaran, M. and Schuetz, M. and Simonsen, A. and M.D. Smith and Stevens, C. and Sullivan, L. and Wardle, G.M. and Wolkovich, E.M. and Wragg, P.D. and Wright, J. and Yang, L.} }