@article {KNZ001712, title = {Drivers of variation in aboveground net primary productivity and plant community composition differ across a broad precipitation gradient}, journal = {Ecosystems}, volume = {19}, year = {2016}, pages = {521-533}, abstract = {

Aboveground net primary production (ANPP) is a key integrator of C uptake and energy flow in many terrestrial ecosystems. As such, ecologists have long sought to understand the factors driving variation in this important ecosystem process. Although total annual precipitation has been shown to be a strong predictor of ANPP in grasslands across broad spatial scales, it is often a poor predictor at local scales. Here we examine the amount of variation in ANPP that can be explained by total annual precipitation versus precipitation during specific periods of the year (precipitation periods) and nutrient availability at three sites representing the major grassland types (shortgrass steppe, mixed-grass prairie, and tallgrass prairie) spanning the broad precipitation gradient of the U.S. Central Great Plains. Using observational data, we found that precipitation periods and nutrient availability were much stronger predictors of site-level ANPP than total annual precipitation. However, the specific nutrients and precipitation periods that best predicted ANPP differed among the three sites. These effects were mirrored experimentally at the shortgrass and tallgrass sites, with precipitation and nutrient availability co-limiting ANPP, but not at the mixed-grass site, where nutrient availability determined ANPP exclusive of precipitation effects. Dominant grasses drove the ANPP response to increased nutrient availability at all three sites. However, the relative responses of rare grasses and forbs were greater than those of the dominant grasses to experimental nutrient additions, thus potentially driving species turnover with chronic nutrient additions. This improved understanding of the factors driving variation in ANPP within ecosystems spanning the broad precipitation gradient of the Great Plains will aid predictions of alterations in ANPP under future global change scenarios.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, dominant species, Great Plains, Nutrient Network (NutNet), nutrients, precipitation periods, rare species}, doi = {10.1007/s10021-015-9949-7}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007\%2Fs10021-015-9949-7}, author = {Kimberly J. La Pierre and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Klein, J.A. and M.D. Smith} } @article {KNZ001697, title = {Plant species{\textquoteright} origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {6}, year = {2015}, pages = {7710 -}, abstract = {

Exotic species dominate many communities; however the functional significance of species\’ biogeographic origin remains highly contentious. This debate is fuelled in part by the lack of globally replicated, systematic data assessing the relationship between species provenance, function and response to perturbations. We examined the abundance of native and exotic plant species at 64 grasslands in 13 countries, and at a subset of the sites we experimentally tested native and exotic species responses to two fundamental drivers of invasion, mineral nutrient supplies and vertebrate herbivory. Exotic species are six times more likely to dominate communities than native species. Furthermore, while experimental nutrient addition increases the cover and richness of exotic species, nutrients decrease native diversity and cover. Native and exotic species also differ in their response to vertebrate consumer exclusion. These results suggest that species origin has functional significance, and that eutrophication will lead to increased exotic dominance in grasslands.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, Biological sciences, ecology, Plant sciences}, doi = {10.1038/ncomms8710}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms8710}, author = {Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Buckley, Y. and Cleland, E.E. and Davies, K.F. and Firn, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Lind, E. and MacDougall, A.S. and Orrock, J.L. and Prober, S.M. and P. Adler and Anderson, T.M. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Cadotte, M. and Chu, C. and Cottingham, K.L. and Crawley, M.J. and Damschen, E.I. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and CeCrappeo, N.M. and G. Du and Fay, P.A. and Frater, P. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Hector, A. and Hillebrand, H. and Hofmockel, K.S. and Humphries, H.C. and Jin, V.L. and Kay, A.D. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and L. Ladwig and Lambrinos, J.G. and Li, Q. and Li, W. and Marushia, R.} } @article {KNZ001793, title = {Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {508}, year = {2014}, pages = {517 - 520}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/nature13144}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13144}, author = {E.T. Borer and Seabloom, E.W. and Gruner, D.S. and Harpole, W.S and Hillebrand, H. and Lind, E.M. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Anderson, T.M. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Buckley, Y.M. and Cadotte, M. and Chu, C. and Cleland, E.E. and Crawley, M.J. and Daleo, P. and Damschen, E.I. and Davies, K.F. and DeCrappeo, N.M. and G. Du and Firn, J. and Hautier, Y. and Heckman, R.W. and Hector, A. and HilleRisLambers, J. and Iribarne, Oscar and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Leakey, A.D.B. and Li, W. and MacDougall, A.S. and McCulley, R.L. and Melbourne, B.A. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore and Mortensen, B. and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and Orrock, J.L. and Pascual, J. and Prober, S.M. and Pyke, D.A. and A. Risch and Schuetz, M. and M.D. Smith and Stevens, C.J. and L.L. Sullivan and Williams, R.J. and Wragg, P.D. and Wright, J.P. and Yang, L.H.} } @article {KNZ001790, title = {Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?}, journal = {Global Change Biology}, volume = {19}, year = {2013}, pages = {3677 - 3687}, abstract = {

Invasions have increased the size of regional species pools, but are typically assumed to reduce native diversity. However, global-scale tests of this assumption have been elusive because of the focus on exotic species richness, rather than relative abundance. This is problematic because low invader richness can indicate invasion resistance by the native community or, alternatively, dominance by a single exotic species. Here, we used a globally replicated study to quantify relationships between exotic richness and abundance in grass-dominated ecosystems in 13 countries on six continents, ranging from salt marshes to alpine tundra. We tested effects of human land use, native community diversity, herbivore pressure, and nutrient limitation on exotic plant dominance. Despite its widespread use, exotic richness was a poor proxy for exotic dominance at low exotic richness, because sites that contained few exotic species ranged from relatively pristine (low exotic richness and cover) to almost completely exotic-dominated ones (low exotic richness but high exotic cover). Both exotic cover and richness were predicted by native plant diversity (native grass richness) and land use (distance to cultivation). Although climate was important for predicting both exotic cover and richness, climatic factors predicting cover (precipitation variability) differed from those predicting richness (maximum temperature and mean temperature in the wettest quarter). Herbivory and nutrient limitation did not predict exotic richness or cover. Exotic dominance was greatest in areas with low native grass richness at the site- or regional-scale. Although this could reflect native grass displacement, a lack of biotic resistance is a more likely explanation, given that grasses comprise the most aggressive invaders. These findings underscore the need to move beyond richness as a surrogate for the extent of invasion, because this metric confounds monodominance with invasion resistance. Monitoring species\&$\#$39; relative abundance will more rapidly advance our understanding of invasions.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/gcb.12370}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.12370}, author = {Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Buckley, Y. and Cleland, E.E. and Davies, K. and Firn, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Lind, E. and MacDougall, A. and Orrock, J.L. and Prober, S.M. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Anderson, M.T. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Caldeira, M. and Chu, C. and Crawley, M.J. and Daleo, P. and Damschen, E.I. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and DeCrappeo, N.M. and Dickman, C.R. and G. Du and Fay, P.A. and Frater, P. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Hector, A. and Helm, A. and Hillebrand, H. and Hofmockel, K.S. and Humphries, H.C. and Iribarne, O. and Jin, V.L. and Kay, A. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and L. Ladwig and Lambrinos, J.G. and Leakey, A.D.B. and Li, Q. and Li, W. and McCulley, R. and Melbourne, B. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and Mortensen, B. and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and P{\"a}rtel, M. and Pascual, J and Pyke, D.A. and A. Risch and Salguero-Gomez, R. and Sankaran, M. and Schuetz, M. and Simonsen, A. and M.D. Smith and Stevens, C. and Sullivan, L. and Wardle, G.M. and Wolkovich, E.M. and Wragg, P.D. and Wright, J. and Yang, L.} } @article {KNZ001455, title = {Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {14}, year = {2011}, pages = {274 -281}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01584.x}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01584.x}, author = {Firn, J. and Joslin L. Moore and MacDougall, A.S. and E.T. Borer and Seabloom, E.W. and HilleRisLambers, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Cleland, E.E. and C.S. Brown and Knops, J.M.H. and Prober, S.M. and Pyke, D.A. and Farrell, K.A. and J.D. Bakker and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and P. Adler and Scott. L. Collins and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and Crawley, M.J. and Wolkovich, E.M. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Melbourne, B.A. and Hautier, Y. and J.W. Morgan and Leakey, A.D.B. and Kay, A.D. and McCulley, R. and Davies, K.F. and Stevens, C.J. and Chu, C. and Holl, K.D. and Klein, J.A. and Fay, P.A. and Hagenah, N. and Kirkman, K.P. and Buckley, Y.M.} } @article {KNZ001448, title = {Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness}, journal = {Science}, volume = {333}, year = {2011}, pages = {1750 -1753}, abstract = {

For more than 30 years, the relationship between net primary productivity and species richness has generated intense debate in ecology about the processes regulating local diversity. The original view, which is still widely accepted, holds that the relationship is hump-shaped, with richness first rising and then declining with increasing productivity. Although recent meta-analyses questioned the generality of hump-shaped patterns, these syntheses have been criticized for failing to account for methodological differences among studies. We addressed such concerns by conducting standardized sampling in 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities on five continents. We found no clear relationship between productivity and fine-scale (meters\−2) richness within sites, within regions, or across the globe. Ecologists should focus on fresh, mechanistic approaches to understanding the multivariate links between productivity and richness.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1126/science.1204498}, url = {http://science.sciencemag.org/content/333/6050/1750}, author = {P. Adler and Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Hillebrand, H. and Hautier, Y. and Hector, A. and Harpole, W.S. and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and Grace, J.B. and Anderson, T.M. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and C.S. Brown and Buckley, Y.M. and Calabrese, L.B. and Chu, C.J. and Cleland, E.E. and Scott. L. Collins and Cottingham, K.L. and Crawley, M.J. and Damschen, E.I. and Davies, K.F. and DeCrappeo, N.M. and Fay, P.A. and Firn, J. and Frater, P. and Gasarch, E.I. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and HilleRisLambers, J. and Humphries, H.C. and Jin, V.L. and Kay, A. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Lambrinos, J.G. and Li, W. and MacDougall, A.S. and McCulley, R.L. and Melbourne, B.A. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore} }