@article {KNZ001564, title = {Fitness among population sources of a dominant species (Andropogon gerardii Vitman) used in prairie restoration}, journal = {Torrey Botanical Society}, volume = {140}, year = {2014}, pages = {269 -279}, abstract = {

Planting native grasses can provide a source of seed for prairie restorations, but requires knowledge of how the plants that establish will perform. This study sought to determine variation in fitness of population sources of Andropogon gerardii, a dominant grassland species, when grown in a mesic common garden. Using multiple population sources, we tested the hypothesis that plants from populations within the local region would exhibit a \‘home-site advantage\’ as measured by higher fitness compared to plants from populations collected from drier regions of the tallgrass prairie ecosystem (up to 986 km west of the common garden). Plants collected from four pristine, never restored population sources from each of three regions (central Kansas, eastern Kansas, and southern Illinois) were raised in the greenhouse from seeds and planted in a common garden in Illinois. To estimate fitness, we used commonly measured traits related to seed production, including flowering tiller number and number of flowering raceme branches, seed number, viability, and percentage germination. There was no evidence of a \‘home-site advantage\’ for populations originating from southern Illinois. Rather, there was high within-region variability in fecundity. Plants from southern Illinois had the largest number of raceme branches per plant. Plants from eastern Kansas had the highest number of vegetative tillers per plant. Plants from central Kansas produced the most germinable seeds. Under the current climate, plants from any one of the three regions may be suitable to propagate seeds for restoration, but other traits may vary among populations to affect height, cover, and productivity.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, Andropogon gerardii, fitness, grassland, reproductive effort, restoration}, doi = {10.3159/TORREY-D-12-00063.1}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-12-00063.1}, author = {D.J. Gibson and Sendor, G. and Donatelli, J. and S.G. Baer and Johnson, L.} } @article {KNZ001360, title = {Nitrous oxide emission from denitrification in stream and river networks}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {108}, year = {2011}, pages = {214 -219}, abstract = {

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change and stratospheric ozone destruction. Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) loading to river networks is a potentially important source of N2O via microbial denitrification that converts N to N2O and dinitrogen (N2). The fraction of denitrified N that escapes as N2O rather than N2 (i.e., the N2O yield) is an important determinant of how much N2O is produced by river networks, but little is known about the N2O yield in flowing waters. Here, we present the results of whole-stream 15N-tracer additions conducted in 72 headwater streams draining multiple land-use types across the United States. We found that stream denitrification produces N2O at rates that increase with stream water nitrate (NO3\−) concentrations, but that \<1\% of denitrified N is converted to N2O. Unlike some previous studies, we found no relationship between the N2O yield and stream water NO3\−. We suggest that increased stream NO3\− loading stimulates denitrification and concomitant N2O production, but does not increase the N2O yield. In our study, most streams were sources of N2O to the atmosphere and the highest emission rates were observed in streams draining urban basins. Using a global river network model, we estimate that microbial N transformations (e.g., denitrification and nitrification) convert at least 0.68 Tg\·y\−1 of anthropogenic N inputs to N2O in river networks, equivalent to 10\% of the global anthropogenic N2O emission rate. This estimate of stream and river N2O emissions is three times greater than estimated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Humans have more than doubled the availability of fixed nitrogen (N) in the biosphere, particularly through the production of N fertilizers and the cultivation of N-fixing crops (1). Increasing N availability is producing unintended environmental consequences including enhanced emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), a potent greenhouse gas (2) and an important cause of stratospheric ozone destruction (3). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that the microbial conversion of agriculturally derived N to N2O in soils and aquatic ecosystems is the largest source of anthropogenic N2O to the atmosphere (2). The production of N2O in agricultural soils has been the focus of intense investigation (i.e., \>1,000 published studies) and is a relatively well constrained component of the N2O budget (4). However, emissions of anthropogenic N2O from streams, rivers, and estuaries have received much less attention and remain a major source of uncertainty in the global anthropogenic N2O budget. Microbial denitrification is a large source of N2O emissions in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Most microbial denitrification is a form of anaerobic respiration in which nitrate (NO3\−, the dominant form of inorganic N) is converted to dinitrogen (N2) and N2O gases (5). The proportion of denitrified NO3\− that is converted to N2O rather than N2 (hereafter referred to as the N2O yield and expressed as the mole ratio) partially controls how much N2O is produced via denitrification (6), but few studies provide information on the N2O yield in streams and rivers because of the difficulty of measuring N2 and N2O production in these systems. Here we report rates of N2 and N2O production via denitrification measured using whole-stream 15NO3\−-tracer experiments in 72 headwater streams draining different land-use types across the United States. This project, known as the second Lotic Intersite Nitrogen eXperiment (LINX II), provides unique whole-system measurements of the N2O yield in streams. Although N2O emission rates have been reported for streams and rivers (7, 8), the N2O yield has been studied mostly in lentic freshwater and marine ecosystems, where it generally ranges between 0.1 and 1.0\%, although yields as high as 6\% have been observed (9). These N2O yields are low compared with observations in soils (0\–100\%) (10), which may be a result of the relatively lower oxygen (O2) availability in the sediments of lakes and estuaries. However, dissolved O2 in headwater streams is commonly near atmospheric equilibrium and benthic algal biofilms can produce O2 at the sediment\–water interface, resulting in strong redox gradients more akin to those in partially wetted soils. Thus, streams may have variable and often high N2O yields, similar to those in soils (11). The N2O yield in headwater streams is of particular interest because much of the NO3\− input to rivers is derived from groundwater upwelling into headwater streams. Furthermore, headwater streams compose the majority of stream length within a drainage network and have high ratios of bioreactive benthic surface area to water volume (12).

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1011464108}, url = {https://www.pnas.org/content/108/1/214}, author = {Beaulieu, J.K. and Tank, J.L. and Hamilton, S.K. and Wollheim, W.M. and Hall, R.O. and Mulholland, P.J. and Peterson, B.J. and L.R. Ashkenas and Cooper, L.W. and Dahm, C.N. and W. K. Dodds and Grimm, N.B. and Johnson, S.L. and W.H. McDowell and Poole, G.C. and Valett, H.M. and Arango, C.P. and Bernot, M.J. and Burgin, A.J. and Crenshaw, C. and Helton, A.M. and Johnson, L. and O{\textquoteright}Brien, J.M. and Potter, J.D. and Sheibley, R.W. and Sobota, D.J. and Thomas, S.M.} } @article {KNZ001347, title = {Inter-regional comparison of land-use effects on stream metabolism}, journal = {Freshwater Biology}, volume = {55}, year = {2010}, pages = {1874 -1890}, abstract = {1. Rates of whole-system metabolism (production and respiration) are fundamental indicators of ecosystem structure and function. Although first-order, proximal controls are well understood, assessments of the interactions between proximal controls and distal controls, such as land use and geographic region, are lacking. Thus, the influence of land use on stream metabolism across geographic regions is unknown. Further, there is limited understanding of how land use may alter variability in ecosystem metabolism across regions. 2. Stream metabolism was measured in nine streams in each of eight regions (n = 72) across the United States and Puerto Rico. In each region, three streams were selected from a range of three land uses: agriculturally influenced, urban-influenced, and reference streams. Stream metabolism was estimated from diel changes in dissolved oxygen concentrations in each stream reach with correction for reaeration and groundwater input. 3. Gross primary production (GPP) was highest in regions with little riparian vegetation (sagebrush steppe in Wyoming, desert shrub in Arizona/New Mexico) and lowest in forested regions (North Carolina, Oregon). In contrast, ecosystem respiration (ER) varied both within and among regions. Reference streams had significantly lower rates of GPP than urban or agriculturally influenced streams. 4. GPP was positively correlated with photosynthetically active radiation and autotrophic biomass. Multiple regression models compared using Akaike{\textquoteright}s information criterion (AIC) indicated GPP increased with water column ammonium and the fraction of the catchment in urban and reference land-use categories. Multiple regression models also identified velocity, temperature, nitrate, ammonium, dissolved organic carbon, GPP, coarse benthic organic matter, fine benthic organic matter and the fraction of all land-use categories in the catchment as regulators of ER. 5. Structural equation modelling indicated significant distal as well as proximal control pathways including a direct effect of land-use on GPP as well as SRP, DIN, and PAR effects on GPP; GPP effects on autotrophic biomass, organic matter, and ER; and organic matter effects on ER. 6. Overall, consideration of the data separated by land-use categories showed reduced inter-regional variability in rates of metabolism, indicating that the influence of agricultural and urban land use can obscure regional differences in stream metabolism.}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02422.x}, author = {Bernot, M.J. and Sobota, D.J. and Hall, R.O. and Mulholland, P.J. and W. K. Dodds and Webster, J.R. and Tank, J.L. and L.R. Ashkenas and Cooper, L.W. and Dahm, C.N. and Gregory, S.V. and Grimm, N.B. and Hamilton, S.K. and Johnson, S.L. and W.H. McDowell and Meyer, J.L. and Peterson, B. and Poole, G.C. and Valett, H.M. and Arango, C.P. and Beaulieu, J.J. and Burgin, A.J. and Crenshaw, C. and Helton, A.M. and Johnson, L. and Merriam, J. and Niederlehner, B.R. and O{\textquoteright}Brien, J.M. and Potter, J.D. and Sheibley, R.W. and Thomas, S.M. and Wilson, K.} } @article {KNZ001164, title = {Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {452}, year = {2008}, pages = {202 -207}, abstract = {

Anthropogenic addition of bioavailable nitrogen to the biosphere is increasing1, 2 and terrestrial ecosystems are becoming increasingly nitrogen-saturated3, causing more bioavailable nitrogen to enter groundwater and surface waters4, 5, 6. Large-scale nitrogen budgets show that an average of about 20\–25 per cent of the nitrogen added to the biosphere is exported from rivers to the ocean or inland basins7, 8, indicating that substantial sinks for nitrogen must exist in the landscape9. Streams and rivers may themselves be important sinks for bioavailable nitrogen owing to their hydrological connections with terrestrial systems, high rates of biological activity, and streambed sediment environments that favour microbial denitrification6, 10, 11. Here we present data from nitrogen stable isotope tracer experiments across 72 streams and 8 regions representing several biomes. We show that total biotic uptake and denitrification of nitrate increase with stream nitrate concentration, but that the efficiency of biotic uptake and denitrification declines as concentration increases, reducing the proportion of in-stream nitrate that is removed from transport. Our data suggest that the total uptake of nitrate is related to ecosystem photosynthesis and that denitrification is related to ecosystem respiration. In addition, we use a stream network model to demonstrate that excess nitrate in streams elicits a disproportionate increase in the fraction of nitrate that is exported to receiving waters and reduces the relative role of small versus large streams as nitrate sinks.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/nature06686}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06686}, author = {Mulholland, P.J. and Helton, A.M. and Poole, G.C. and Hall, R.O. Jr. and Hamilton, S.K. and Peterson, B.J. and Tank, J.L. and L.R. Ashkenas and Cooper, L.W. and Dahm, C.N. and W. K. Dodds and Findlay, S.E.G. and Gregory, S.V. and Grimm, N.B. and Johnson, S.L. and W.H. McDowell and Meyer, J.L. and Valett, H.M. and Webster, J.R. and Arango, C.P. and Beaulieu, J.J. and Bernot, M.J. and Burgin, A.J. and Crenshaw, C. and Johnson, L. and Niederlehner, B.R. and O{\textquoteright}Brien, J.M. and Potter, J.D. and Sheibley, R.W. and Sobota, D.J. and Thomas, S.M.} }