@article {6238, title = {Compositional variation in grassland plant communities}, journal = {Ecosphere}, volume = {14}, year = {2023}, pages = {e4542}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1002/ecs2.v14.610.1002/ecs2.4542}, url = {https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4542}, author = {Bakker, Jonathan D. and Price, Jodi N. and Henning, Jeremiah A. and Batzer, Evan E. and Ohlert, Timothy J. and Wainwright, Claire E. and Adler, Peter B. and Alberti, Juan and Arnillas, Carlos Alberto and Biederman, Lori A. and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Brudvig, Lars A. and Buckley, Yvonne M. and Bugalho, Miguel N. and Cadotte, Marc W. and Caldeira, Maria C. and Catford, Jane A. and Chen, Qingqing and Crawley, Michael J. and Daleo, Pedro and Dickman, Chris R. and Donohue, Ian and DuPre, Mary Ellyn and Ebeling, Anne and Eisenhauer, Nico and Fay, Philip A. and Gruner, Daniel S. and Haider, Sylvia and Hautier, Yann and Jentsch, Anke and Kirkman, Kevin and Knops, Johannes M. H. and Lannes, Lu{\'\i}ola S. and MacDougall, Andrew S. and McCulley, Rebecca L. and Mitchell, Rachel M. and Moore, Joslin L. and Morgan, John W. and Mortensen, Brent and Olde Venterink, Harry and Peri, Pablo L. and Power, Sally A. and Prober, Suzanne M. and Roscher, Christiane and Sankaran, Mahesh and Seabloom, Eric W. and M. D. Smith and Stevens, Carly and Sullivan, Lauren L. and Tedder, Michelle and Veen, G. F. (Ciska) and Virtanen, Risto and Wardle, Glenda M.} } @article {5970, title = {Negative effects of nitrogen override positive effects of phosphorus on grassland legumes worldwide}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, volume = {118}, year = {2021}, pages = {e2023718118}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2023718118}, url = {http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.2023718118}, author = {Tognetti, Pedro M. and Prober, Suzanne M. and B{\'a}ez, Selene and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Firn, Jennifer and Risch, Anita C. and Schuetz, Martin and Simonsen, Anna K. and Yahdjian, Laura and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Seabloom, Eric W. and Arnillas, Carlos Alberto and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Brown, Cynthia S. and Cadotte, Marc W. and Caldeira, Maria C. and Daleo, Pedro and Dwyer, John M. and Fay, Philip A. and Gherardi, Laureano A. and Hagenah, Nicole and Hautier, Yann and Kimberly J. Komatsu and McCulley, Rebecca L. and Price, Jodi N. and Standish, Rachel J. and Stevens, Carly J. and Wragg, Peter D. and Sankaran, Mahesh} } @article {KNZ001965, title = {Global change effects on plant communities are magnified by time and the number of global change factors imposed}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, volume = {116}, year = {2019}, pages = {17867-17873}, abstract = {

Global change drivers (GCDs) are expected to alter community structure and consequently, the services that ecosystems provide. Yet, few experimental investigations have examined effects of GCDs on plant community structure across multiple ecosystem types, and those that do exist present conflicting patterns. In an unprecedented global synthesis of over 100 experiments that manipulated factors linked to GCDs, we show that herbaceous plant community responses depend on experimental manipulation length and number of factors manipulated. We found that plant communities are fairly resistant to experimentally manipulated GCDs in the short term (\<10 y). In contrast, long-term (\≥10 y) experiments show increasing community divergence of treatments from control conditions. Surprisingly, these community responses occurred with similar frequency across the GCD types manipulated in our database. However, community responses were more common when 3 or more GCDs were simultaneously manipulated, suggesting the emergence of additive or synergistic effects of multiple drivers, particularly over long time periods. In half of the cases, GCD manipulations caused a difference in community composition without a corresponding species richness difference, indicating that species reordering or replacement is an important mechanism of community responses to GCDs and should be given greater consideration when examining consequences of GCDs for the biodiversity\–ecosystem function relationship. Human activities are currently driving unparalleled global changes worldwide. Our analyses provide the most comprehensive evidence to date that these human activities may have widespread impacts on plant community composition globally, which will increase in frequency over time and be greater in areas where communities face multiple GCDs simultaneously.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1819027116}, url = {https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/08/14/1819027116}, author = {Kimberly J. Komatsu and M.L. Avolio and Lemoine, Nathan P. and Isbell, Forest and Grman, Emily and Houseman, Gregory R. and Koerner, Sally E. and Johnson, D.S. and K.R. Wilcox and Juha M. Alatalo and Anderson, J.P. and Aerts, R. and S.G. Baer and Baldwin, Andrew H. and Bates, J. and Beierkuhnlein, C. and Belote, R.T. and John M. Blair and Bloor, J.M.G. and Bohlen, P.J. and Edward W. Bork and Elizabeth H. Boughton and W.D. Bowman and Britton, Andrea J. and Cahill, James F. and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Chiariello, N.R. and Cheng, Jimin. and Scott. L. Collins and Cornelissen, J.H.C. and G. Du and Eskelinen, Anu and Firn, Jennifer and Foster, B. and Gough, L. and Gross, K. and Hallett, L.M. and Han, X. and Harmens, H. and Hovenden, M.J. and Jagerbrand, A. and Jentsch, A. and Kern, Christel and Klanderud, Kari and Alan K. Knapp and Kreyling, Juergen and Li, W. and Luo, Yiqi and McCulley, R.L. and McLaren, Jennie R. and Megonigal, Patrick and J.W. Morgan and Onipchenko, Vladimir and Pennings, S.C. and Prev{\'e}y, J.S. and Price, Jodi N. and P.B. Reich and Robinson, Clare H. and Russell, L.F. and Sala, O.E. and Seabloom, E.W. and M.D. Smith and Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A. and Souza, Lara and K.N. Suding and Suttle, B.K. and Svejcar, T. and Tilman, David and Tognetti, P. and Turkington, R. and White, S. and Xu, Zhuwen and Yahdjian, L. and Yu, Q. and Zhang, Pengfei and Zhang, Yunhai} } @article {KNZ001894, title = {Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality}, journal = {Nature Ecology \& Evolution}, volume = {2}, year = {2018}, pages = {50-56}, abstract = {

Biodiversity is declining in many local communities while also becoming increasingly homogenized across space. Experiments show that local plant species loss reduces ecosystem functioning and services, but the role of spatial homogenization of community composition and the potential interaction between diversity at different scales in maintaining ecosystem functioning remains unclear, especially when many functions are considered (ecosystem multifunctionality). We present an analysis of eight ecosystem functions measured in 65 grasslands worldwide. We find that more diverse grasslands\—those with both species-rich local communities (α-diversity) and large compositional differences among localities (β-diversity)\—had higher levels of multifunctionality. Moreover, α- and β-diversity synergistically affected multifunctionality, with higher levels of diversity at one scale amplifying the contribution to ecological functions at the other scale. The identity of species influencing ecosystem functioning differed among functions and across local communities, explaining why more diverse grasslands maintained greater functionality when more functions and localities were considered. These results were robust to variation in environmental drivers. Our findings reveal that plant diversity, at both local and landscape scales, contributes to the maintenance of multiple ecosystem services provided by grasslands. Preserving ecosystem functioning therefore requires conservation of biodiversity both within and among ecological communities.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/s41559-017-0395-0}, url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0395-0}, author = {Hautier, Yann and Isbell, Forest and E.T. Borer and Seabloom, Eric W. and Harpole, W. Stanley and Lind, Eric M. and MacDougall, Andrew S. and Stevens, Carly J. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Brudvig, Lars A. and Buckley, Yvonne M. and Cadotte, Marc and Caldeira, Maria C. and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Chu, Chengjin and Daleo, Pedro and Dickman, Christopher R. and Dwyer, John M. and Eskelinen, Anu and Fay, Philip A. and Firn, Jennifer and Hagenah, Nicole and Hillebrand, Helmut and Iribarne, Oscar and Kirkman, Kevin P. and Knops, Johannes M. H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and McCulley, Rebecca L. and J.W. Morgan and P{\"a}rtel, Meelis and Pascual, Jesus and Price, Jodi N. and Prober, Suzanne M. and Risch, Anita C. and Sankaran, Mahesh and Schuetz, Martin and Standish, Rachel J. and Virtanen, Risto and Wardle, Glenda M. and Yahdjian, Laura and Hector, Andy} } @article {KNZ001842, title = {Asynchrony among local communities stabilises ecosystem function of metacommunities}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, year = {2017}, abstract = {

Temporal stability of ecosystem functioning increases the predictability and reliability of ecosystem services, and understanding the drivers of stability across spatial scales is important for land management and policy decisions. We used species-level abundance data from 62 plant communities across five continents to assess mechanisms of temporal stability across spatial scales. We assessed how asynchrony (i.e. different units responding dissimilarly through time) of species and local communities stabilised metacommunity ecosystem function. Asynchrony of species increased stability of local communities, and asynchrony among local communities enhanced metacommunity stability by a wide range of magnitudes (1\–315\%); this range was positively correlated with the size of the metacommunity. Additionally, asynchronous responses among local communities were linked with species\’ populations fluctuating asynchronously across space, perhaps stemming from physical and/or competitive differences among local communities. Accordingly, we suggest spatial heterogeneity should be a major focus for maintaining the stability of ecosystem services at larger spatial scales.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, Alpha diversity, alpha variability, beta diversity, Biodiversity, CoRRE data base, patchiness, Plant communities, Primary productivity, species synchrony}, doi = {10.1111/ele.12861}, url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12861/epdf}, author = {K.R. Wilcox and Tredennick, Andrew T. and Koerner, Sally E. and Grman, Emily and Hallett, Lauren M. and M.L. Avolio and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Houseman, Gregory R. and Isbell, Forest and Johnson, David Samuel and Juha M. Alatalo and Baldwin, Andrew H. and Edward W. Bork and Elizabeth H. Boughton and W.D. Bowman and Britton, Andrea J. and Cahill, James F. and Scott. L. Collins and G. Du and Eskelinen, Anu and Gough, Laura and Jentsch, Anke and Kern, Christel and Klanderud, Kari and Alan K. Knapp and Kreyling, Juergen and Luo, Yiqi and McLaren, Jennie R. and Megonigal, Patrick and Onipchenko, Vladimir and Prev{\'e}y, Janet and Price, Jodi N. and Robinson, Clare H. and Sala, Osvaldo E. and M.D. Smith and Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A. and Souza, Lara and Tilman, David and White, Shannon R. and Xu, Zhuwen and Yahdjian, Laura and Yu, Qiang and Zhang, Pengfei and Zhang, Yunhai}, editor = {Gurevitch, Jessica} }