@article {6238, title = {Compositional variation in grassland plant communities}, journal = {Ecosphere}, volume = {14}, year = {2023}, pages = {e4542}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1002/ecs2.v14.610.1002/ecs2.4542}, url = {https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4542}, author = {Bakker, Jonathan D. and Price, Jodi N. and Henning, Jeremiah A. and Batzer, Evan E. and Ohlert, Timothy J. and Wainwright, Claire E. and Adler, Peter B. and Alberti, Juan and Arnillas, Carlos Alberto and Biederman, Lori A. and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Brudvig, Lars A. and Buckley, Yvonne M. and Bugalho, Miguel N. and Cadotte, Marc W. and Caldeira, Maria C. and Catford, Jane A. and Chen, Qingqing and Crawley, Michael J. and Daleo, Pedro and Dickman, Chris R. and Donohue, Ian and DuPre, Mary Ellyn and Ebeling, Anne and Eisenhauer, Nico and Fay, Philip A. and Gruner, Daniel S. and Haider, Sylvia and Hautier, Yann and Jentsch, Anke and Kirkman, Kevin and Knops, Johannes M. H. and Lannes, Lu{\'\i}ola S. and MacDougall, Andrew S. and McCulley, Rebecca L. and Mitchell, Rachel M. and Moore, Joslin L. and Morgan, John W. and Mortensen, Brent and Olde Venterink, Harry and Peri, Pablo L. and Power, Sally A. and Prober, Suzanne M. and Roscher, Christiane and Sankaran, Mahesh and Seabloom, Eric W. and M. D. Smith and Stevens, Carly and Sullivan, Lauren L. and Tedder, Michelle and Veen, G. F. (Ciska) and Virtanen, Risto and Wardle, Glenda M.} } @article {6110, title = {Nutrient identity modifies the destabilising effects of eutrophication in grasslands}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {259}, year = {2022}, pages = {754 - 765}, abstract = {

Nutrient enrichment can simultaneously increase and destabilise plant biomass production, with co-limitation by multiple nutrients potentially intensifying these effects. Here, we test how factorial additions of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium with essential nutrients (K+) affect the stability (mean/standard deviation) of aboveground biomass in 34 grasslands over 7 years. Destabilisation with fertilisation was prevalent but was driven by single nutrients, not synergistic nutrient interactions. On average, N-based treatments increased mean biomass production by 21\–51\% but increased its standard deviation by 40\–68\% and so consistently reduced stability. Adding P increased interannual variability and reduced stability without altering mean biomass, while K+ had no general effects. Declines in stability were largest in the most nutrient-limited grasslands, or where nutrients reduced species richness or intensified species synchrony. We show that nutrients can differentially impact the stability of biomass production, with N and P in particular disproportionately increasing its interannual variability.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, issn = {1461-023X}, doi = {10.1111/ele.v25.410.1111/ele.13946}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ele.13946}, author = {Carroll, Oliver and Batzer, Evan and Bharath, Siddharth and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Campana, {\'\i}a and Esch, Ellen and Hautier, Yann and Ohlert, Timothy and Seabloom, Eric W. and Adler, Peter B. and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Biederman, Lori and Bugalho, Miguel N. and Caldeira, Maria and Chen, Qingqing and Davies, Kendi F. and Fay, Philip A. and Knops, Johannes M. H. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Martina, Jason P. and McCann, Kevin S. and Moore, Joslin L. and Morgan, John W. and Muraina, Taofeek O. and Osborne, Brooke and Risch, Anita C. and Stevens, Carly and Wilfahrt, Peter A. and Yahdjian, Laura and MacDougall, Andrew S.}, editor = {Pe{\~n}uelas, Josep} } @article {KNZ002029, title = {Global impacts of fertilization and herbivore removal on soil net nitrogen mineralization are modulated by local climate and soil properties}, journal = {Global Change Biology}, volume = {26}, year = {2020}, abstract = {

Soil nitrogen (N) availability is critical for grassland functioning. However, human activities have increased the supply of biologically limiting nutrients, and changed the density and identity of mammalian herbivores. These anthropogenic changes may alter net soil N mineralization (soil net Nmin), that is, the net balance between N mineralization and immobilization, which could severely impact grassland structure and functioning. Yet, to date, little is known about how fertilization and herbivore removal individually, or jointly, affect soil net Nmin across a wide range of grasslands that vary in soil and climatic properties. Here we collected data from 22 grasslands on five continents, all part of a globally replicated experiment, to assess how fertilization and herbivore removal affected potential (laboratory-based) and realized (field-based) soil net Nmin. Herbivore removal in the absence of fertilization did not alter potential and realized soil net Nmin. However, fertilization alone and in combination with herbivore removal consistently increased potential soil net Nmin. Realized soil net Nmin, in contrast, significantly decreased in fertilized plots where herbivores were removed. Treatment effects on potential and realized soil net Nmin were contingent on site-specific soil and climatic properties. Fertilization effects on potential soil net Nmin were larger at sites with higher mean annual precipitation (MAP) and temperature of the wettest quarter (T.q.wet). Reciprocally, realized soil net Nmin declined most strongly with fertilization and herbivore removal at sites with lower MAP and higher T.q.wet. In summary, our findings show that anthropogenic nutrient enrichment, herbivore exclusion and alterations in future climatic conditions can negatively impact soil net Nmin across global grasslands under realistic field conditions. This is an important context-dependent knowledge for grassland management worldwide.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/gcb.15308}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gcb.15308}, author = {Risch, Anita C. and Zimmermann, Stefan and Moser, Barbara and Sch{\"u}tz, Martin and Hagedorn, Frank and Firn, Jennifer and Fay, Philip A. and Adler, Peter B. and Biederman, Lori A. and J. M. Blair and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Broadbent, Arthur A. D. and Brown, Cynthia S. and Cadotte, Marc W. and Caldeira, Maria C. and Davies, Kendi F. and Virgilio, Augustina and Eisenhauer, Nico and Eskelinen, Anu and Knops, Johannes M. H. and MacDougall, Andrew S. and McCulley, Rebecca L. and Melbourne, Brett A. and Moore, Joslin L. and Power, Sally A. and Prober, Suzanne M. and Seabloom, Eric W. and Siebert, Julia and Silveira, Maria L. and Speziale, Karina L. and Stevens, Carly J. and Tognetti, Pedro M. and Virtanen, Risto and Yahdjian, Laura and Ochoa-Hueso, Raul} } @article {KNZ001894, title = {Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality}, journal = {Nature Ecology \& Evolution}, volume = {2}, year = {2018}, pages = {50-56}, abstract = {

Biodiversity is declining in many local communities while also becoming increasingly homogenized across space. Experiments show that local plant species loss reduces ecosystem functioning and services, but the role of spatial homogenization of community composition and the potential interaction between diversity at different scales in maintaining ecosystem functioning remains unclear, especially when many functions are considered (ecosystem multifunctionality). We present an analysis of eight ecosystem functions measured in 65 grasslands worldwide. We find that more diverse grasslands\—those with both species-rich local communities (α-diversity) and large compositional differences among localities (β-diversity)\—had higher levels of multifunctionality. Moreover, α- and β-diversity synergistically affected multifunctionality, with higher levels of diversity at one scale amplifying the contribution to ecological functions at the other scale. The identity of species influencing ecosystem functioning differed among functions and across local communities, explaining why more diverse grasslands maintained greater functionality when more functions and localities were considered. These results were robust to variation in environmental drivers. Our findings reveal that plant diversity, at both local and landscape scales, contributes to the maintenance of multiple ecosystem services provided by grasslands. Preserving ecosystem functioning therefore requires conservation of biodiversity both within and among ecological communities.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/s41559-017-0395-0}, url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0395-0}, author = {Hautier, Yann and Isbell, Forest and E.T. Borer and Seabloom, Eric W. and Harpole, W. Stanley and Lind, Eric M. and MacDougall, Andrew S. and Stevens, Carly J. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Brudvig, Lars A. and Buckley, Yvonne M. and Cadotte, Marc and Caldeira, Maria C. and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Chu, Chengjin and Daleo, Pedro and Dickman, Christopher R. and Dwyer, John M. and Eskelinen, Anu and Fay, Philip A. and Firn, Jennifer and Hagenah, Nicole and Hillebrand, Helmut and Iribarne, Oscar and Kirkman, Kevin P. and Knops, Johannes M. H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and McCulley, Rebecca L. and J.W. Morgan and P{\"a}rtel, Meelis and Pascual, Jesus and Price, Jodi N. and Prober, Suzanne M. and Risch, Anita C. and Sankaran, Mahesh and Schuetz, Martin and Standish, Rachel J. and Virtanen, Risto and Wardle, Glenda M. and Yahdjian, Laura and Hector, Andy} } @article {KNZ001893, title = {Out of the shadows: multiple nutrient limitations drive relationships among biomass, light and plant diversity}, journal = {Functional Ecology}, volume = {31}, year = {2017}, pages = {1839-1846}, abstract = {
  1. The paradigmatic hypothesis for the effect of fertilisation on plant diversity represents a one-dimensional trade-off for plants competing for below-ground nutrients (generically) and above-ground light: fertilisation reduces competition for nutrients while increasing biomass and thereby shifts competition for depleted available light.
  2. The essential problem of this simple paradigm is that it misses both the multivariate and mechanistic nature of the factors that determine biodiversity as well as their causal relationships.
  3. We agree that light limitation, as DeMalach and Kadmon argue, can indeed be an important factor associated with diversity loss, and we presented it as an integral part of our tests of the niche dimension hypothesis.
  4. We disagree with DeMalach and Kadmon that light is the \‘main\’ factor explaining diversity, because this misrepresents the causal structure represented in the design of our experiment in which multiple nutrient addition was the ultimate causal driver of a suite of correlated responses that included diversity and light, and especially live and dead biomass, which are the factors that control light depletion.
  5. Our findings highlight that multiple nutrient limitations can structure plant diversity and composition independently of changes in light and biomass. For example, approximately one-third of our sites showed no significant increase in biomass with greater number of added nutrients yet still lost diversity when nutrients were added.
  6. The important message is that while light limitation can be an important contributor to diversity loss, it is not a necessary mechanism.
}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/1365-2435.12967}, url = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1365-2435.12967}, author = {Harpole, W. Stanley and L.L. Sullivan and Lind, Eric M. and Firn, Jennifer and P. Adler and E.T. Borer and Chase, Jonathan and Fay, Philip A. and Hautier, Yann and Hillebrand, Helmut and MacDougall, Andrew S. and Seabloom, Eric W. and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Cadotte, Marc W. and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Chu, Chengjin and Hagenah, Nicole and Kirkman, Kevin and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and Prober, Suzanne M. and Risch, Anita C. and Schuetz, Martin and Stevens, Carly J.}, editor = {Thompson, Ken} }