@article {6200, title = {Clarifying the effect of biodiversity on productivity in natural ecosystems with longitudinal data and new methods for causal inference}, journal = {Nature Communications}, year = {In Press}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, author = {Dee, L.E. and Ferraro, P.J. and Severen, C. and Kimmel, K. and Borer, E.T. and Byrnes, J.E.K. and Clark, A. and Hautier, Y. and Hector, A. and Raynaud, X. and Reich, P.B. and Wright, A. and Arnillas, C.A. and Davies, K.F. and MacDougall, A.S. and Mori, A. and Smith, M.D. and Adler, P.B. and Bakker, J.D. and Braumann, K. and Cowles, J.M. and Komatsu, K.J. and Knops, J. and McCulley, R. and Moore, J.L. and Morgan, J.W. and Ohlert, T. and Power, S.A. and Sullivan, L. and Stevens, C. and Loreau, M.} } @article {KNZ002041, title = {Increasing effects of chronic nutrient enrichment on plant diversity loss and ecosystem productivity over time}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {102}, year = {2021}, pages = {e03218}, abstract = {

Human activities are enriching many of Earth\’s ecosystems with biologically limiting mineral nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). In grasslands, this enrichment generally reduces plant diversity and increases productivity. The widely demonstrated positive effect of diversity on productivity suggests a potential negative feedback, whereby nutrient-induced declines in diversity reduce the initial gains in productivity arising from nutrient enrichment. In addition, plant productivity and diversity can be inhibited by accumulations of dead biomass, which may be altered by nutrient enrichment. Over longer timeframes, nutrient addition may increase soil fertility by increasing soil organic matter and nutrient pools. We examined the effects of 5-11 years of nutrient addition at 47 grasslands in twelve countries. Nutrient enrichment increased aboveground live biomass and reduced plant diversity at nearly all sites, and these effects became stronger over time. We did not find evidence that nutrient-induced losses of diversity reduced the positive effects of nutrients on biomass, however nutrient effects on live biomass increased more slowly at sites where litter was also increasing, regardless of plant diversity. This work suggests that short-term experiments may underestimate the long-term nutrient enrichment effects on global, grassland ecosystems.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1002/ecy.3218}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.3218}, author = {Seabloom, E.W. and Adler, P.B. and Alberti, J. and Biederman, L. and Buckley, Y.M. and Cadotte, M.W. and S.L Collins and Dee, L. and Fay, P.A. and Firn, J. and Hagenah, N. and Harpole, W. S. and Hautier, Y. and Hector, A. and Hobbie, S.E. and Isbell, F. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Laungani, R. and MacDougall, A. and McCulley, R.L. and Moore, J.L. and Morgan, J.W. and Ohlert, T. and Prober, S.M. and Risch, A.C. and Schuetz, M. and Stevens, C.J. and Borer, E.T.} } @article {KNZ001945, title = {Belowground biomass response to nutrient enrichment depends on light limitation across globally distributed grasslands}, journal = {Ecosystems}, volume = {22}, year = {2019}, pages = {1466{\textendash}1477}, abstract = {

Anthropogenic activities are increasing nutrient inputs to ecosystems worldwide, with consequences for global carbon and nutrient cycles. Recent meta-analyses show that aboveground primary production is often co-limited by multiple nutrients; however, little is known about how root production responds to changes in nutrient availability. At twenty-nine grassland sites on four continents, we quantified shallow root biomass responses to nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium plus micronutrient enrichment and compared below- and aboveground responses. We hypothesized that optimal allocation theory would predict context dependence in root biomass responses to nutrient enrichment, given variation among sites in the resources limiting to plant growth (specifically light versus nutrients). Consistent with the predictions of optimal allocation theory, the proportion of total biomass belowground declined with N or P addition, due to increased biomass aboveground (for N and P) and decreased biomass belowground (N, particularly in sites with low canopy light penetration). Absolute root biomass increased with N addition where light was abundant at the soil surface, but declined in sites where the grassland canopy intercepted a large proportion of incoming light. These results demonstrate that belowground responses to changes in resource supply can differ strongly from aboveground responses, which could significantly modify predictions of future rates of nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration. Our results also highlight how optimal allocation theory developed for individual plants may help predict belowground biomass responses to nutrient enrichment at the ecosystem scale across wide climatic and environmental gradients.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, belowground biomass, Fertilization, nitrogen, Nutrient Network, optimal allocation, phosphorus roots}, doi = {10.1007/s10021-019-00350-4}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007\%2Fs10021-019-00350-4}, author = {Cleland, Elsa E. and Lind, Eric M. and DeCrappeo, Nicole M. and DeLorenze, Elizabeth and Wilkins, Rachel Abbott and P. Adler and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Brown, Cynthia S. and Davies, Kendi F. and Esch, Ellen and Firn, Jennifer and Gressard, Scott and Gruner, Daniel S. and Hagenah, Nicole and Harpole, W. Stanley and Hautier, Yann and Hobbie, Sarah E. and Hofmockel, Kirsten S. and Kirkman, Kevin and Knops, Johannes and Kopp, Christopher W. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and MacDougall, Andrew and McCulley, Rebecca L. and Melbourne, Brett A. and Joslin L. Moore and Prober, Suzanne M. and Riggs, Charlotte and Risch, Anita C. and Schuetz, Martin and Stevens, Carly and Wragg, Peter D. and Wright, Justin and E.T. Borer and Seabloom, Eric W.} } @article {KNZ001985, title = {Soil net nitrogen mineralisation across global grasslands}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {10}, year = {2019}, abstract = {

Soil nitrogen mineralisation (Nmin), the conversion of organic into inorganic N, is important for productivity and nutrient cycling. The balance between mineralisation and immobilisation (net Nmin) varies with soil properties and climate. However, because most global-scale assessments of net Nmin are laboratory-based, its regulation under field-conditions and implications for real-world soil functioning remain uncertain. Here, we explore the drivers of realised (field) and potential (laboratory) soil net Nmin across 30 grasslands worldwide. We find that realised Nmin is largely explained by temperature of the wettest quarter, microbial biomass, clay content and bulk density. Potential Nmin only weakly correlates with realised Nmin, but contributes to explain realised net Nmin when combined with soil and climatic variables. We provide novel insights of global realised soil net Nmin and show that potential soil net Nmin data available in the literature could be parameterised with soil and climate data to better predict realised Nmin.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-019-12948-2}, url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12948-2}, author = {Risch, A.C. and Zimmermann, S. and Ochoa-Hueso, R. and sch{\"u}tz, M. and Frey, B. and Firn, J. L. and Fay, P. A. and Hagedorn, F. and E.T. Borer and Seabloom, E. W. and Harpole, W. S. and Knops, J. M. H. and McCulley, R. L. and Broadbent, A. A. D. and Stevens, C. J. and Silveira, M. L. and P. Adler and B{\'a}ez, S. and L.A. Biederman and John M. Blair and Brown, C. S. and Caldeira, M. C. and Scott. L. Collins and Daleo, P. and di Virgilio, A. and Ebeling, A. and Eisenhauer, N. and Esch, E. and Eskelinen, A. and Hagenah, N. and Hautier, Y. and Kirkman, K. P. and MacDougall, A. S. and Joslin L. Moore and Power, S. A. and Prober, S. M. and Roscher, C. and Sankaran, M. and Siebert, J. and Speziale, K. L. and Tognetti, P. M. and Virtanen, R. and Yahdjian, L. and Moser, B.} } @article {KNZ001894, title = {Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality}, journal = {Nature Ecology \& Evolution}, volume = {2}, year = {2018}, pages = {50-56}, abstract = {

Biodiversity is declining in many local communities while also becoming increasingly homogenized across space. Experiments show that local plant species loss reduces ecosystem functioning and services, but the role of spatial homogenization of community composition and the potential interaction between diversity at different scales in maintaining ecosystem functioning remains unclear, especially when many functions are considered (ecosystem multifunctionality). We present an analysis of eight ecosystem functions measured in 65 grasslands worldwide. We find that more diverse grasslands\—those with both species-rich local communities (α-diversity) and large compositional differences among localities (β-diversity)\—had higher levels of multifunctionality. Moreover, α- and β-diversity synergistically affected multifunctionality, with higher levels of diversity at one scale amplifying the contribution to ecological functions at the other scale. The identity of species influencing ecosystem functioning differed among functions and across local communities, explaining why more diverse grasslands maintained greater functionality when more functions and localities were considered. These results were robust to variation in environmental drivers. Our findings reveal that plant diversity, at both local and landscape scales, contributes to the maintenance of multiple ecosystem services provided by grasslands. Preserving ecosystem functioning therefore requires conservation of biodiversity both within and among ecological communities.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/s41559-017-0395-0}, url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0395-0}, author = {Hautier, Yann and Isbell, Forest and E.T. Borer and Seabloom, Eric W. and Harpole, W. Stanley and Lind, Eric M. and MacDougall, Andrew S. and Stevens, Carly J. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Brudvig, Lars A. and Buckley, Yvonne M. and Cadotte, Marc and Caldeira, Maria C. and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Chu, Chengjin and Daleo, Pedro and Dickman, Christopher R. and Dwyer, John M. and Eskelinen, Anu and Fay, Philip A. and Firn, Jennifer and Hagenah, Nicole and Hillebrand, Helmut and Iribarne, Oscar and Kirkman, Kevin P. and Knops, Johannes M. H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and McCulley, Rebecca L. and J.W. Morgan and P{\"a}rtel, Meelis and Pascual, Jesus and Price, Jodi N. and Prober, Suzanne M. and Risch, Anita C. and Sankaran, Mahesh and Schuetz, Martin and Standish, Rachel J. and Virtanen, Risto and Wardle, Glenda M. and Yahdjian, Laura and Hector, Andy} } @article {KNZ001882, title = {Spatial heterogeneity in species composition constrains plant community responses to herbivory and fertilisation}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {21}, year = {2018}, pages = {1364 -1371}, abstract = {

Environmental change can result in substantial shifts in community composition. The associated immigration and extinction events are likely constrained by the spatial distribution of species. Still, studies on environmental change typically quantify biotic responses at single spatial (time series within a single plot) or temporal (spatial beta diversity at single time points) scales, ignoring their potential interdependence. Here, we use data from a global network of grassland experiments to determine how turnover responses to two major forms of environmental change \– fertilisation and herbivore loss \– are affected by species pool size and spatial compositional heterogeneity. Fertilisation led to higher rates of local extinction, whereas turnover in herbivore exclusion plots was driven by species replacement. Overall, sites with more spatially heterogeneous composition showed significantly higher rates of annual turnover, independent of species pool size and treatment. Taking into account spatial biodiversity aspects will therefore improve our understanding of consequences of global and anthropogenic change on community dynamics.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/ele.13102}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ele.13102}, author = {Hodapp, Dorothee and E.T. Borer and Harpole, W. Stanley and Lind, Eric M. and Seabloom, Eric W. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Arnillas, Carlos A. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and Cadotte, Marc and Cleland, Elsa E. and Scott. L. Collins and Fay, Philip A. and Firn, Jennifer and Hagenah, Nicole and Hautier, Yann and Iribarne, Oscar and Knops, Johannes M. H. and McCulley, Rebecca L. and MacDougall, Andrew and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and Mortensen, Brent and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Risch, Anita C. and Sch{\"u}tz, Martin and Peri, Pablo and Stevens, Carly J. and Wright, Justin and Hillebrand, Helmut}, editor = {Gurevitch, Jessica} } @article {KNZ001893, title = {Out of the shadows: multiple nutrient limitations drive relationships among biomass, light and plant diversity}, journal = {Functional Ecology}, volume = {31}, year = {2017}, pages = {1839-1846}, abstract = {
  1. The paradigmatic hypothesis for the effect of fertilisation on plant diversity represents a one-dimensional trade-off for plants competing for below-ground nutrients (generically) and above-ground light: fertilisation reduces competition for nutrients while increasing biomass and thereby shifts competition for depleted available light.
  2. The essential problem of this simple paradigm is that it misses both the multivariate and mechanistic nature of the factors that determine biodiversity as well as their causal relationships.
  3. We agree that light limitation, as DeMalach and Kadmon argue, can indeed be an important factor associated with diversity loss, and we presented it as an integral part of our tests of the niche dimension hypothesis.
  4. We disagree with DeMalach and Kadmon that light is the \‘main\’ factor explaining diversity, because this misrepresents the causal structure represented in the design of our experiment in which multiple nutrient addition was the ultimate causal driver of a suite of correlated responses that included diversity and light, and especially live and dead biomass, which are the factors that control light depletion.
  5. Our findings highlight that multiple nutrient limitations can structure plant diversity and composition independently of changes in light and biomass. For example, approximately one-third of our sites showed no significant increase in biomass with greater number of added nutrients yet still lost diversity when nutrients were added.
  6. The important message is that while light limitation can be an important contributor to diversity loss, it is not a necessary mechanism.
}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/1365-2435.12967}, url = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1365-2435.12967}, author = {Harpole, W. Stanley and L.L. Sullivan and Lind, Eric M. and Firn, Jennifer and P. Adler and E.T. Borer and Chase, Jonathan and Fay, Philip A. and Hautier, Yann and Hillebrand, Helmut and MacDougall, Andrew S. and Seabloom, Eric W. and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Cadotte, Marc W. and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Chu, Chengjin and Hagenah, Nicole and Kirkman, Kevin and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and Prober, Suzanne M. and Risch, Anita C. and Schuetz, Martin and Stevens, Carly J.}, editor = {Thompson, Ken} } @article {KNZ001755, title = {Addition of multiple limiting resources reduces grassland diversity}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {537}, year = {2016}, pages = {93-96}, abstract = {

Niche dimensionality provides a general theoretical explanation for biodiversity\—more niches, defined by more limiting factors, allow for more ways that species can coexist1. Because plant species compete for the same set of limiting resources, theory predicts that addition of a limiting resource eliminates potential trade-offs, reducing the number of species that can coexist2. Multiple nutrient limitation of plant production is common and therefore fertilization may reduce diversity by reducing the number or dimensionality of belowground limiting factors. At the same time, nutrient addition, by increasing biomass, should ultimately shift competition from belowground nutrients towards a one-dimensional competitive trade-off for light3. Here we show that plant species diversity decreased when a greater number of limiting nutrients were added across 45 grassland sites from a multi-continent experimental network4. The number of added nutrients predicted diversity loss, even after controlling for effects of plant biomass, and even where biomass production was not nutrient-limited. We found that elevated resource supply reduced niche dimensionality and diversity and increased both productivity5 and compositional turnover. Our results point to the importance of understanding dimensionality in ecological systems that are undergoing diversity loss in response to multiple global change factors.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/nature19324}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nature19324}, author = {Harpole, W. S. and L.L. Sullivan and Lind, E.M. and Firn, J. and P. Adler and E.T. Borer and Chase, J. and Fay, P.A. and Hautier, Y. and Hillebrand, H. and MacDougall, A.S. and Seabloom, E.W. and Williams, R. and J.D. Bakker and Cadotte, M.W. and Chaneton, E.J. and Chu, C. and Cleland, E.E. and Antonio, C. and Davies, K.F. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Kirkman, K. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and McCulley, R.L. and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and Prober, S.M. and A. Risch and Schuetz, M. and Stevens, C.J. and Wragg, P.D.} } @article {KNZ001787, title = {Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {529}, year = {2016}, pages = {390 - 393}, abstract = {

How ecosystem productivity and species richness are interrelated is one of the most debated subjects in the history of ecology1. Decades of intensive study have yet to discern the actual mechanisms behind observed global patterns2, 3. Here, by integrating the predictions from multiple theories into a single model and using data from 1,126 grassland plots spanning five continents, we detect the clear signals of numerous underlying mechanisms linking productivity and richness. We find that an integrative model has substantially higher explanatory power than traditional bivariate analyses. In addition, the specific results unveil several surprising findings that conflict with classical models4, 5, 6, 7. These include the isolation of a strong and consistent enhancement of productivity by richness, an effect in striking contrast with superficial data patterns. Also revealed is a consistent importance of competition across the full range of productivity values, in direct conflict with some (but not all) proposed models. The promotion of local richness by macroecological gradients in climatic favourability, generally seen as a competing hypothesis8, is also found to be important in our analysis. The results demonstrate that an integrative modelling approach leads to a major advance in our ability to discern the underlying processes operating in ecological systems.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/nature16524}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nature16524}, author = {Grace, J.B. and Anderson, T.M. and Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and P. Adler and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Hillebrand, H. and Lind, E.M. and P{\"a}rtel, M. and J.D. Bakker and Buckley, Y.M. and Crawley, M.J. and Damschen, E.I. and Davies, K.F. and Fay, P.A. and Firn, J. and Gruner, D.S. and Hector, A. and Knops, J.M.H. and MacDougall, A.S. and Melbourne, B.A. and J.W. Morgan and Orrock, J.L. and Prober, S.M. and M.D. Smith} } @article {KNZ001788, title = {Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients}, journal = {Nature Plants}, volume = {1}, year = {2015}, pages = {15080}, abstract = {

Terrestrial ecosystem productivity is widely accepted to be nutrient limited1. Although nitrogen (N) is deemed a key determinant of aboveground net primary production (ANPP)2,3, the prevalence of co-limitation by N and phosphorus (P) is increasingly recognized4,​5,​6,​7,​8. However, the extent to which terrestrial productivity is co-limited by nutrients other than N and P has remained unclear. Here, we report results from a standardized factorial nutrient addition experiment, in which we added N, P and potassium (K) combined with a selection of micronutrients (K+μ), alone or in concert, to 42 grassland sites spanning five continents, and monitored ANPP. Nutrient availability limited productivity at 31 of the 42 grassland sites. And pairwise combinations of N, P, and K+μ co-limited ANPP at 29 of the sites. Nitrogen limitation peaked in cool, high latitude sites. Our findings highlight the importance of less studied nutrients, such as K and micronutrients, for grassland productivity, and point to significant variations in the type and degree of nutrient limitation. We suggest that multiple-nutrient constraints must be considered when assessing the ecosystem-scale consequences of nutrient enrichment.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/nplants.2015.80}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nplants201580}, author = {Fay, P.A. and Prober, S.M. and Harpole, W.S. and Knops, J.M.H. and J.D. Bakker and E.T. Borer and Lind, E.M. and MacDougall, A.S. and Seabloom, E.W. and Wragg, P.D. and P. Adler and D.M. Blumenthal and Buckley, Y.M. and Chu, C. and Cleland, E.E. and Scott. L. Collins and Davies, K.F. and G. Du and Feng, X. and Firn, J. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Hautier, Y. and Heckman, R.W. and Jin, V.L. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J. and L. Ladwig and Li, Q. and McCulley, R.L. and Melbourne, B.A. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and A. Risch and sch{\"u}tz, M. and Stevens, C.J. and Wedin, D.A. and Yang, L.H.} } @article {KNZ001678, title = {Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {18}, year = {2015}, pages = {85 -95}, abstract = {

Aboveground\–belowground interactions exert critical controls on the composition and function of terrestrial ecosystems, yet the fundamental relationships between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity remain elusive. Theory predicts predominantly positive associations but tests within single sites have shown variable relationships, and associations between plant and microbial diversity across broad spatial scales remain largely unexplored. We compared the diversity of plant, bacterial, archaeal and fungal communities in one hundred and forty-five 1 m2 plots across 25 temperate grassland sites from four continents. Across sites, the plant alpha diversity patterns were poorly related to those observed for any soil microbial group. However, plant beta diversity (compositional dissimilarity between sites) was significantly correlated with the beta diversity of bacterial and fungal communities, even after controlling for environmental factors. Thus, across a global range of temperate grasslands, plant diversity can predict patterns in the composition of soil microbial communities, but not patterns in alpha diversity.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/ele.12381}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ele.12381}, author = {Prober, S.M. and Leff, J.W. and Bates, S.T. and E.T. Borer and Firn, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Lind, E.M. and Seabloom, E.W. and P. Adler and J.D. Bakker and E.E Cleland and DeCrappeo, N.M. and DeLorenze, E. and Hagenah, N. and Hautier, Y. and Hofmockel, K.S. and Kirkman, K.P. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and MacDougall, A.S. and McCulley, R.L. and Mitchell, C.E. and A. Risch and Schuetz, M. and Stevens, C.J. and Williams, R.J. and Fierer, N.} } @article {KNZ001697, title = {Plant species{\textquoteright} origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {6}, year = {2015}, pages = {7710 -}, abstract = {

Exotic species dominate many communities; however the functional significance of species\’ biogeographic origin remains highly contentious. This debate is fuelled in part by the lack of globally replicated, systematic data assessing the relationship between species provenance, function and response to perturbations. We examined the abundance of native and exotic plant species at 64 grasslands in 13 countries, and at a subset of the sites we experimentally tested native and exotic species responses to two fundamental drivers of invasion, mineral nutrient supplies and vertebrate herbivory. Exotic species are six times more likely to dominate communities than native species. Furthermore, while experimental nutrient addition increases the cover and richness of exotic species, nutrients decrease native diversity and cover. Native and exotic species also differ in their response to vertebrate consumer exclusion. These results suggest that species origin has functional significance, and that eutrophication will lead to increased exotic dominance in grasslands.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, Biological sciences, ecology, Plant sciences}, doi = {10.1038/ncomms8710}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms8710}, author = {Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Buckley, Y. and Cleland, E.E. and Davies, K.F. and Firn, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Lind, E. and MacDougall, A.S. and Orrock, J.L. and Prober, S.M. and P. Adler and Anderson, T.M. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Cadotte, M. and Chu, C. and Cottingham, K.L. and Crawley, M.J. and Damschen, E.I. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and CeCrappeo, N.M. and G. Du and Fay, P.A. and Frater, P. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Hector, A. and Hillebrand, H. and Hofmockel, K.S. and Humphries, H.C. and Jin, V.L. and Kay, A.D. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and L. Ladwig and Lambrinos, J.G. and Li, Q. and Li, W. and Marushia, R.} } @article {KNZ001792, title = {Anthropogenic-based regional-scale factors most consistently explain plot-level exotic diversity in grasslands}, journal = {Global Ecology and Biogeography}, volume = {23}, year = {2014}, pages = {802 - 810}, abstract = {

Aim Evidence linking the accumulation of exotic species to the suppression of native diversity is equivocal, often relying on data from studies that have used different methods. Plot-level studies often attribute inverse relationships between native and exotic diversity to competition, but regional abiotic filters, including anthropogenic influences, can produce similar patterns. We seek to test these alternatives using identical scale-dependent sampling protocols in multiple grasslands on two continents. Location Thirty-two grassland sites in North America and Australia. Methods We use multiscale observational data, collected identically in grain and extent at each site, to test the association of local and regional factors with the plot-level richness and abundance of native and exotic plants. Sites captured environmental and anthropogenic gradients including land-use intensity, human population density, light and soil resources, climate and elevation. Site selection occurred independently of exotic diversity, meaning that the numbers of exotic species varied randomly thereby reducing potential biases if only highly invaded sites were chosen. Results Regional factors associated directly or indirectly with human activity had the strongest associations with plot-level diversity. These regional drivers had divergent effects: urban-based economic activity was associated with high exotic\ :\ native diversity ratios; climate- and landscape-based indicators of lower human population density were associated with low exotic\ :\ native ratios. Negative correlations between plot-level native and exotic diversity, a potential signature of competitive interactions, were not prevalent; this result did not change along gradients of productivity or heterogeneity. Main conclusion We show that plot-level diversity of native and exotic plants are more consistently associated with regional-scale factors relating to urbanization and climate suitability than measures indicative of competition. These findings clarify the long-standing difficulty in resolving drivers of exotic diversity using single-factor mechanisms, suggesting that multiple interacting anthropogenic-based processes best explain the accumulation of exotic diversity in modern landscapes.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/geb.12157}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.12157}, author = {MacDougall, A.S. and Bennett, J.R. and Firn, J. and Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Lind, E.M. and Orrock, J.L. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and P. Adler and Cleland, E. and Davies, K. and Melbourne, B. and Prober, S.M. and J.D. Bakker and Fay, P.A. and Jin, V.L. and Kendig, A. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and Stevens, C.J.} } @article {KNZ001632, title = {Eutrophication weakens stabilizing effects of diversity in natural grasslands}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {508}, year = {2014}, pages = {521 -525}, abstract = {

Studies of experimental grassland communities1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 have demonstrated that plant diversity can stabilize productivity through species asynchrony, in which decreases in the biomass of some species are compensated for by increases in others1, 2. However, it remains unknown whether these findings are relevant to natural ecosystems, especially those for which species diversity is threatened by anthropogenic global change8, 9, 10, 11. Here we analyse diversity\–stability relationships from 41 grasslands on five continents and examine how these relationships are affected by chronic fertilization, one of the strongest drivers of species loss globally8. Unmanipulated communities with more species had greater species asynchrony, resulting in more stable biomass production, generalizing a result from biodiversity experiments to real-world grasslands. However, fertilization weakened the positive effect of diversity on stability. Contrary to expectations, this was not due to species loss after eutrophication but rather to an increase in the temporal variation of productivity in combination with a decrease in species asynchrony in diverse communities. Our results demonstrate separate and synergistic effects of diversity and eutrophication on stability, emphasizing the need to understand how drivers of global change interactively affect the reliable provisioning of ecosystem services in real-world systems.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ, Biodiversity, Community ecology, Grassland ecology}, doi = {10.1038/nature13014}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13014}, author = {Hautier, Y. and Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and P. Adler and Harpole, W.S. and Hillebrand, H. and Lind, E.M. and MacDougall, A.S. and Stevens, C.J. and J.D. Bakker and Buckley, Y.M. and Chu, C. and Scott. L. Collins and Daleo, P. and Damschen, E.I. and Davies, K.F. and Fay, P.A. and Firn, J. and Gruner, D.S. and Jin, V.L. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Li, W. and McCulley, R.L. and Melbourne, B.A. and Joslin L. Moore and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and Prober, S.M. and A. Risch and Sankaran, M. and Schuetz, M. and Hector, A.} } @article {KNZ001793, title = {Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {508}, year = {2014}, pages = {517 - 520}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/nature13144}, url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13144}, author = {E.T. Borer and Seabloom, E.W. and Gruner, D.S. and Harpole, W.S and Hillebrand, H. and Lind, E.M. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Anderson, T.M. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Buckley, Y.M. and Cadotte, M. and Chu, C. and Cleland, E.E. and Crawley, M.J. and Daleo, P. and Damschen, E.I. and Davies, K.F. and DeCrappeo, N.M. and G. Du and Firn, J. and Hautier, Y. and Heckman, R.W. and Hector, A. and HilleRisLambers, J. and Iribarne, Oscar and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Leakey, A.D.B. and Li, W. and MacDougall, A.S. and McCulley, R.L. and Melbourne, B.A. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore and Mortensen, B. and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and Orrock, J.L. and Pascual, J. and Prober, S.M. and Pyke, D.A. and A. Risch and Schuetz, M. and M.D. Smith and Stevens, C.J. and L.L. Sullivan and Williams, R.J. and Wragg, P.D. and Wright, J.P. and Yang, L.H.} } @article {KNZ001791, title = {Life-history constraints in grassland plant species: a growth-defence trade-off is the norm}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {16}, year = {2013}, pages = {513 - 521}, abstract = {

Plant growth can be limited by resource acquisition and defence against consumers, leading to contrasting trade-off possibilities. The competition-defence hypothesis posits a trade-off between competitive ability and defence against enemies (e.g. herbivores and pathogens). The growth-defence hypothesis suggests that strong competitors for nutrients are also defended against enemies, at a cost to growth rate. We tested these hypotheses using observations of 706 plant populations of over 500 species before and following identical fertilisation and fencing treatments at 39 grassland sites worldwide. Strong positive covariance in species responses to both treatments provided support for a growth-defence trade-off: populations that increased with the removal of nutrient limitation (poor competitors) also increased following removal of consumers. This result held globally across 4 years within plant life-history groups and within the majority of individual sites. Thus, a growth-defence trade-off appears to be the norm, and mechanisms maintaining grassland biodiversity may operate within this constraint.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/ele.12078}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ele.12078}, author = {Lind, E.M. and E.T. Borer and Seabloom, E. and P. Adler and J.D. Bakker and D.M. Blumenthal and Crawley, M. and Davies, K. and Firn, J. and Gruner, D.S. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Hillebrand, H. and Knops, J. and Melbourne, B. and Mortensen, B. and A. Risch and Schuetz, M. and Stevens, C. and Wragg, P.D.} } @article {KNZ001790, title = {Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?}, journal = {Global Change Biology}, volume = {19}, year = {2013}, pages = {3677 - 3687}, abstract = {

Invasions have increased the size of regional species pools, but are typically assumed to reduce native diversity. However, global-scale tests of this assumption have been elusive because of the focus on exotic species richness, rather than relative abundance. This is problematic because low invader richness can indicate invasion resistance by the native community or, alternatively, dominance by a single exotic species. Here, we used a globally replicated study to quantify relationships between exotic richness and abundance in grass-dominated ecosystems in 13 countries on six continents, ranging from salt marshes to alpine tundra. We tested effects of human land use, native community diversity, herbivore pressure, and nutrient limitation on exotic plant dominance. Despite its widespread use, exotic richness was a poor proxy for exotic dominance at low exotic richness, because sites that contained few exotic species ranged from relatively pristine (low exotic richness and cover) to almost completely exotic-dominated ones (low exotic richness but high exotic cover). Both exotic cover and richness were predicted by native plant diversity (native grass richness) and land use (distance to cultivation). Although climate was important for predicting both exotic cover and richness, climatic factors predicting cover (precipitation variability) differed from those predicting richness (maximum temperature and mean temperature in the wettest quarter). Herbivory and nutrient limitation did not predict exotic richness or cover. Exotic dominance was greatest in areas with low native grass richness at the site- or regional-scale. Although this could reflect native grass displacement, a lack of biotic resistance is a more likely explanation, given that grasses comprise the most aggressive invaders. These findings underscore the need to move beyond richness as a surrogate for the extent of invasion, because this metric confounds monodominance with invasion resistance. Monitoring species\&$\#$39; relative abundance will more rapidly advance our understanding of invasions.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/gcb.12370}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.12370}, author = {Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Buckley, Y. and Cleland, E.E. and Davies, K. and Firn, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Lind, E. and MacDougall, A. and Orrock, J.L. and Prober, S.M. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Anderson, M.T. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Caldeira, M. and Chu, C. and Crawley, M.J. and Daleo, P. and Damschen, E.I. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and DeCrappeo, N.M. and Dickman, C.R. and G. Du and Fay, P.A. and Frater, P. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Hector, A. and Helm, A. and Hillebrand, H. and Hofmockel, K.S. and Humphries, H.C. and Iribarne, O. and Jin, V.L. and Kay, A. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and L. Ladwig and Lambrinos, J.G. and Leakey, A.D.B. and Li, Q. and Li, W. and McCulley, R. and Melbourne, B. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and Mortensen, B. and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and P{\"a}rtel, M. and Pascual, J and Pyke, D.A. and A. Risch and Salguero-Gomez, R. and Sankaran, M. and Schuetz, M. and Simonsen, A. and M.D. Smith and Stevens, C. and Sullivan, L. and Wardle, G.M. and Wolkovich, E.M. and Wragg, P.D. and Wright, J. and Yang, L.} } @article {KNZ001484, title = {Sensitivity of mean annual primary production to precipitation}, journal = {Global Change Biology}, volume = {18}, year = {2012}, pages = {2246 -2255}, abstract = {

In many terrestrial ecosystems, variation in aboveground net primary production (ANPP) is positively correlated with variation in interannual precipitation. Global climate change will alter both the mean and the variance of annual precipitation, but the relative impact of these changes in precipitation on mean ANPP remains uncertain. At any given site, the slope of the precipitation-ANPP relationship determines the sensitivity of mean ANPP to changes in mean precipitation, whereas the curvature of the precipitation-ANPP relationship determines the sensitivity of ANPP to changes in precipitation variability. We used 58 existing long-term data sets to characterize precipitation-ANPP relationships in terrestrial ecosystems and to quantify the sensitivity of mean ANPP to the mean and variance of annual precipitation. We found that most study sites have a nonlinear, saturating relationship between precipitation and ANPP, but these nonlinearities were not strong. As a result of these weak nonlinearities, ANPP was nearly 40 times more sensitive to precipitation mean than variance. A 1\% increase in mean precipitation caused a \−0.2\% to 1.8\% change in mean ANPP, with a 0.64\% increase on average. Sensitivities to precipitation mean peaked at sites with a mean annual precipitation near 500 mm. Changes in species composition and increased intra-annual precipitation variability could lead to larger ANPP responses to altered precipitation regimes than predicted by our analysis.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02687.x}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02687.x}, author = {Hsu, J.S. and Powell, J. and P. Adler} } @article {KNZ001455, title = {Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {14}, year = {2011}, pages = {274 -281}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01584.x}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01584.x}, author = {Firn, J. and Joslin L. Moore and MacDougall, A.S. and E.T. Borer and Seabloom, E.W. and HilleRisLambers, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Cleland, E.E. and C.S. Brown and Knops, J.M.H. and Prober, S.M. and Pyke, D.A. and Farrell, K.A. and J.D. Bakker and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and P. Adler and Scott. L. Collins and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and Crawley, M.J. and Wolkovich, E.M. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Melbourne, B.A. and Hautier, Y. and J.W. Morgan and Leakey, A.D.B. and Kay, A.D. and McCulley, R. and Davies, K.F. and Stevens, C.J. and Chu, C. and Holl, K.D. and Klein, J.A. and Fay, P.A. and Hagenah, N. and Kirkman, K.P. and Buckley, Y.M.} } @article {KNZ001448, title = {Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness}, journal = {Science}, volume = {333}, year = {2011}, pages = {1750 -1753}, abstract = {

For more than 30 years, the relationship between net primary productivity and species richness has generated intense debate in ecology about the processes regulating local diversity. The original view, which is still widely accepted, holds that the relationship is hump-shaped, with richness first rising and then declining with increasing productivity. Although recent meta-analyses questioned the generality of hump-shaped patterns, these syntheses have been criticized for failing to account for methodological differences among studies. We addressed such concerns by conducting standardized sampling in 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities on five continents. We found no clear relationship between productivity and fine-scale (meters\−2) richness within sites, within regions, or across the globe. Ecologists should focus on fresh, mechanistic approaches to understanding the multivariate links between productivity and richness.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1126/science.1204498}, url = {http://science.sciencemag.org/content/333/6050/1750}, author = {P. Adler and Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Hillebrand, H. and Hautier, Y. and Hector, A. and Harpole, W.S. and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and Grace, J.B. and Anderson, T.M. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and C.S. Brown and Buckley, Y.M. and Calabrese, L.B. and Chu, C.J. and Cleland, E.E. and Scott. L. Collins and Cottingham, K.L. and Crawley, M.J. and Damschen, E.I. and Davies, K.F. and DeCrappeo, N.M. and Fay, P.A. and Firn, J. and Frater, P. and Gasarch, E.I. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and HilleRisLambers, J. and Humphries, H.C. and Jin, V.L. and Kay, A. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Lambrinos, J.G. and Li, W. and MacDougall, A.S. and McCulley, R.L. and Melbourne, B.A. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore} } @article {KNZ001016, title = {A comparison of the species-timerelationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups}, journal = {Oikos}, volume = {112}, year = {2006}, pages = {185 -195}, abstract = {The species{\textendash}time relationship (STR) describes how the species richness of a community increases with the time span over which the community is observed. This pattern has numerous implications for both theory and conservation in much the same way as the species{\textendash}area relationship (SAR). However, the STR has received much less attention and to date only a handful of papers have been published on the pattern. Here we gather together 984 community time-series, representing 15 study areas and nine taxonomic groups, and evaluate their STRs in order to assess the generality of the STR, its consistency across ecosystems and taxonomic groups, its functional form, and its relationship to local species richness. In general, STRs were surprisingly similar across major taxonomic groups and ecosystem types. STRs tended to be well fit by both power and logarithmic functions, and power function exponents typically ranged between 0.2 and 0.4. Communities with high richness tended to have lower STR exponents, suggesting that factors increasing richness may simultaneously decrease turnover in ecological systems. Our results suggest that the STR is as fundamental an ecological pattern as the SAR, and raise questions about the general processes underlying this pattern. They also highlight the dynamic nature of most species assemblages, and the need to incorporate time scale in both basic and applied research on species richness patterns.}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14223.x}, author = {White, E.P. and P. Adler and Lauenroth, W.K. and Gill, R.A. and Greenberg, D. and Kaufman, D.M. and Rassweiler, A. and Rusak, J.A. and M. A. Smith and Steinbeck, J. and Waide, R.B. and Yao, J.} } @article {KNZ001008, title = {Evidence for a general species-time-area relationship}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {86}, year = {2005}, pages = {2032 -2039}, abstract = {The species{\textendash}area relationship (SAR) plays a central role in biodiversity research, and recent work has increased awareness of its temporal analogue, the species{\textendash} time relationship (STR). Here we provide evidence for a general species{\textendash}time{\textendash}area relationship (STAR), in which species number is a function of the area and time span of sampling, as well as their interaction. For eight assemblages, ranging from lake zooplankton to desert rodents, this model outperformed a sampling-based model and two simpler models in which area and time had independent effects. In every case, the interaction term was negative, meaning that rates of species accumulation in space decreased with the time span of sampling, while species accumulation rates in time decreased with area sampled. Although questions remain about its precise functional form, the STAR provides a tool for scaling species richness across time and space, for comparing the relative rates of species turnover in space and time at different scales of sampling, and for rigorous testing of mechanisms proposed to drive community dynamics. Our results show that the SAR and STR are not separate relationships but two dimensions of one unified pattern.}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1890/05-0067}, author = {P. Adler and White, E.P. and Lauenroth, W.K. and Kaufman, D.M. and Rassweiler, A. and Rusak, J.A.} }