@article {KNZ002041,
	title = {Increasing effects of chronic nutrient enrichment on plant diversity loss and ecosystem productivity over time},
	journal = {Ecology},
	volume = {102},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {e03218},
	abstract = {<p>Human activities are enriching many of Earth\&rsquo;s ecosystems with biologically limiting mineral nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). In grasslands, this enrichment generally reduces plant diversity and increases productivity. The widely demonstrated positive effect of diversity on productivity suggests a potential negative feedback, whereby nutrient-induced declines in diversity reduce the initial gains in productivity arising from nutrient enrichment. In addition, plant productivity and diversity can be inhibited by accumulations of dead biomass, which may be altered by nutrient enrichment. Over longer timeframes, nutrient addition may increase soil fertility by increasing soil organic matter and nutrient pools. We examined the effects of 5-11 years of nutrient addition at 47 grasslands in twelve countries. Nutrient enrichment increased aboveground live biomass and reduced plant diversity at nearly all sites, and these effects became stronger over time. We did not find evidence that nutrient-induced losses of diversity reduced the positive effects of nutrients on biomass, however nutrient effects on live biomass increased more slowly at sites where litter was also increasing, regardless of plant diversity. This work suggests that short-term experiments may underestimate the long-term nutrient enrichment effects on global, grassland ecosystems.</p>},
	keywords = {LTER-KNZ},
	doi = {10.1002/ecy.3218},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.3218},
	author = {Seabloom, E.W. and Adler, P.B. and Alberti, J. and Biederman, L. and Buckley, Y.M. and Cadotte, M.W. and S.L Collins and Dee, L. and Fay, P.A. and Firn, J. and Hagenah, N. and Harpole, W. S. and Hautier, Y. and Hector, A. and Hobbie, S.E. and Isbell, F. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Laungani, R. and MacDougall, A. and McCulley, R.L. and Moore, J.L. and Morgan, J.W. and Ohlert, T. and Prober, S.M. and Risch, A.C. and Schuetz, M. and Stevens, C.J. and Borer, E.T.}
}
@article {KNZ001790,
	title = {Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?},
	journal = {Global Change Biology},
	volume = {19},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {3677 - 3687},
	abstract = {<p>Invasions have increased the size of regional species pools, but are typically assumed to reduce native diversity. However, global-scale tests of this assumption have been elusive because of the focus on exotic species richness, rather than relative abundance. This is problematic because low invader richness can indicate invasion resistance by the native community or, alternatively, dominance by a single exotic species. Here, we used a globally replicated study to quantify relationships between exotic richness and abundance in grass-dominated ecosystems in 13 countries on six continents, ranging from salt marshes to alpine tundra. We tested effects of human land use, native community diversity, herbivore pressure, and nutrient limitation on exotic plant dominance. Despite its widespread use, exotic richness was a poor proxy for exotic dominance at low exotic richness, because sites that contained few exotic species ranged from relatively pristine (low exotic richness and cover) to almost completely exotic-dominated ones (low exotic richness but high exotic cover). Both exotic cover and richness were predicted by native plant diversity (native grass richness) and land use (distance to cultivation). Although climate was important for predicting both exotic cover and richness, climatic factors predicting cover (precipitation variability) differed from those predicting richness (maximum temperature and mean temperature in the wettest quarter). Herbivory and nutrient limitation did not predict exotic richness or cover. Exotic dominance was greatest in areas with low native grass richness at the site- or regional-scale. Although this could reflect native grass displacement, a lack of biotic resistance is a more likely explanation, given that grasses comprise the most aggressive invaders. These findings underscore the need to move beyond richness as a surrogate for the extent of invasion, because this metric confounds monodominance with invasion resistance. Monitoring species\&$\#$39; relative abundance will more rapidly advance our understanding of invasions.</p>},
	keywords = {LTER-KNZ},
	doi = {10.1111/gcb.12370},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.12370},
	author = {Seabloom, E.W. and E.T. Borer and Buckley, Y. and Cleland, E.E. and Davies, K. and Firn, J. and Harpole, W.S. and Hautier, Y. and Lind, E. and MacDougall, A. and Orrock, J.L. and Prober, S.M. and P. Adler and J. Alberti and Anderson, M.T. and J.D. Bakker and L.A. Biederman and D.M. Blumenthal and C.S. Brown and Brudvig, L.A. and Caldeira, M. and Chu, C. and Crawley, M.J. and Daleo, P. and Damschen, E.I. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and DeCrappeo, N.M. and Dickman, C.R. and G. Du and Fay, P.A. and Frater, P. and Gruner, D.S. and Hagenah, N. and Hector, A. and Helm, A. and Hillebrand, H. and Hofmockel, K.S. and Humphries, H.C. and Iribarne, O. and Jin, V.L. and Kay, A. and Kirkman, K.P. and Klein, J.A. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and L. Ladwig and Lambrinos, J.G. and Leakey, A.D.B. and Li, Q. and Li, W. and McCulley, R. and Melbourne, B. and Mitchell, C.E. and Joslin L. Moore and J.W. Morgan and Mortensen, B. and O{\textquoteright}Halloran, L.R. and P{\"a}rtel, M. and Pascual, J and Pyke, D.A. and A. Risch and Salguero-Gomez, R. and Sankaran, M. and Schuetz, M. and Simonsen, A. and M.D. Smith and Stevens, C. and Sullivan, L. and Wardle, G.M. and Wolkovich, E.M. and Wragg, P.D. and Wright, J. and Yang, L.}
}
