@article {6145, title = {Nutrient addition drives declines in grassland species richness primarily via enhanced species loss}, journal = {Journal of Ecology}, volume = {111}, year = {2023}, pages = {552-563}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/1365-2745.14038}, url = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.14038}, author = {Muehleisen, Andrew J. and Watkins, Carmen R. E. and Altmire, Gabriella R. and Shaw, E. Ashley and Case, Madelon F. and Aoyama, Lina and Brambila, Alejandro and Reed, Paul B. and LaForgia, Marina and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Seabloom, Eric W. and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Amillas, Carlos Alberto and Biederman, Lori and Chen, Qingqing and Cleland, Elsa E. and Fay, Philip A. and Hagenah, Nicole and Harpole, Stan and Hautier, Yann and Henning, Jeremiah A. and Knops, Johannes M. H. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Ladouceur, Emma and MacDougall, Andrew and McCulley, Rebecca L. and Moore, Joslin L. and Ohlert, Tim and Power, Sally A. and Stevens, Carly J. and Wilfahrt, Peter and Hallett, Lauren M.} } @article {6163, title = {Do trade-offs govern plant species{\textquoteright} responses to different global change treatments?}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {103}, year = {2022}, pages = {e3626}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, issn = {0012-9658}, doi = {10.1002/ecy.3626}, url = {https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.3626}, author = {Langley, J. Adam and Grman, Emily and K.R. Wilcox and M.L. Avolio and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Collins, Scott L. and Koerner, S.E. and M. D. Smith and Baldwin, Andrew H. and Bowman, William and Chiariello, Nona and Eskelinen, Anu and Harmens, Harry and Hovenden, Mark and Klanderud, Kari and McCulley, Rebecca L. and Onipchenko, Vladimir G. and Robinson, Clare H. and K.N. Suding} } @article {6133, title = {Linking changes in species composition and biomass in a globally distributed grassland experiment}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {25}, year = {2022}, pages = {2699-2712}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/ele.14126}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14126}, author = {Ladouceur, Emma and Blowes, Shane A. and Chase, Jonathan M. and Clark, Adam T. and Garbowski, Magda and Alberti, Juan and Arnillas, Carlos Alberto and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Barrio, Isabel C. and Bharath, Siddharth and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Brudvig, Lars A. and Cadotte, Marc W. and Chen, Qingqing and Collins, Scott L. and Dickman, Christopher R. and Donohue, Ian and Du, Guozhen and Ebeling, Anne and Eisenhauer, Nico and Fay, Philip A. and Hagenah, Nicole and Hautier, Yann and Jentsch, Anke and J{\'o}nsd{\'o}ttir, Ingibj{\"o}rg S. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and MacDougall, Andrew and Martina, Jason P. and Moore, Joslin L. and Morgan, John W. and Peri, Pablo L. and Power, ~A. and Ren, Zhengwei and Risch, Anita C. and Roscher, Christiane and Schuchardt, ~A. and Seabloom, Eric W. and Stevens, Carly J. and Veen, G.F. (Ciska) and Virtanen, Risto and Wardle, Glenda M. and Wilfahrt, Peter A. and Harpole, W. Stanley} } @article {6125, title = {Making sense of multivariate community responses in global change experiments}, journal = {Ecosphere}, volume = {13}, year = {2022}, pages = {e4249}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1002/ecs2.4249}, url = {https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4249}, author = {M.L. Avolio and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Koerner, S.E. and Grman, Emily and Isbell, Forest and Johnson, David S. and K.R. Wilcox and Alatalo, Juha M. and Baldwin, Andrew H. and Beierkuhnlein, Carl and Britton, Andrea J. and Foster, Bryan L. and Harmens, Harry and Kern, Christel C. and Li, Wei and McLaren, Jennie R. and Reich, Peter B. and Souza, Lara and Yu, Qiang and Zhang, Yunhai} } @article {6112, title = {Nutrient enrichment increases invertebrate herbivory and pathogen damage in grasslands}, journal = {Journal of Ecology}, volume = {110}, year = {2022}, pages = {327 - 339}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/1365-2745.13801}, url = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2745.13801}, author = {Ebeling, Anne and Strauss, Alex T. and Adler, Peter B. and Arnillas, Carlos A. and Barrio, ~C. and Biederman, Lori A. and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Bugalho, Miguel N. and Caldeira, ~C. and Cadotte, Marc W. and Daleo, Pedro and Eisenhauer, Nico and Eskelinen, Anu and Fay, Philip A. and Firn, Jennifer and Graff, Pamela and Hagenah, Nicole and Haider, Sylvia and Kimberly J. Komatsu and McCulley, ~L. and Mitchell, Charles E. and Moore, Joslin L. and Pascual, Jesus and Peri, Pablo L. and Power, Sally A. and Prober, Suzanne M. and Risch, ~C. and Roscher, Christiane and Sankaran, Mahesh and Seabloom, ~W. and Schielzeth, Holger and Sch{\"u}tz, Martin and Speziale, Karina L. and Tedder, Michelle and Virtanen, Risto and Blumenthal, Dana M.} } @article {6110, title = {Nutrient identity modifies the destabilising effects of eutrophication in grasslands}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {259}, year = {2022}, pages = {754 - 765}, abstract = {

Nutrient enrichment can simultaneously increase and destabilise plant biomass production, with co-limitation by multiple nutrients potentially intensifying these effects. Here, we test how factorial additions of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium with essential nutrients (K+) affect the stability (mean/standard deviation) of aboveground biomass in 34 grasslands over 7 years. Destabilisation with fertilisation was prevalent but was driven by single nutrients, not synergistic nutrient interactions. On average, N-based treatments increased mean biomass production by 21\–51\% but increased its standard deviation by 40\–68\% and so consistently reduced stability. Adding P increased interannual variability and reduced stability without altering mean biomass, while K+ had no general effects. Declines in stability were largest in the most nutrient-limited grasslands, or where nutrients reduced species richness or intensified species synchrony. We show that nutrients can differentially impact the stability of biomass production, with N and P in particular disproportionately increasing its interannual variability.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, issn = {1461-023X}, doi = {10.1111/ele.v25.410.1111/ele.13946}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ele.13946}, author = {Carroll, Oliver and Batzer, Evan and Bharath, Siddharth and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Campana, {\'\i}a and Esch, Ellen and Hautier, Yann and Ohlert, Timothy and Seabloom, Eric W. and Adler, Peter B. and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Biederman, Lori and Bugalho, Miguel N. and Caldeira, Maria and Chen, Qingqing and Davies, Kendi F. and Fay, Philip A. and Knops, Johannes M. H. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Martina, Jason P. and McCann, Kevin S. and Moore, Joslin L. and Morgan, John W. and Muraina, Taofeek O. and Osborne, Brooke and Risch, Anita C. and Stevens, Carly and Wilfahrt, Peter A. and Yahdjian, Laura and MacDougall, Andrew S.}, editor = {Pe{\~n}uelas, Josep} } @article {KNZ002048, title = {Defining codominance in plant communities}, journal = {New Phytologist}, volume = {230}, year = {2021}, pages = {1716-1730}, abstract = {

Species dominance and biodiversity in plant communities have received considerable attention and characterisation. However, species codominance, while often alleged, is seldom defined or quantified. Codominance is a common phenomenon and is likely to be an important driver of community structure, ecosystem function and the stability of both. Here we review the use of the term \‘codominance\’ and find inconsistencies in its use, suggesting that the scientific community currently lacks a universal understanding of codominance. We address this issue by: (1) qualitatively defining codominance as mostly shared abundance that is distinctively isolated within a subset of a community, and (2) presenting a novel metric for quantifying the degree to which relative abundances are shared among a codominant subset of plant species, while also accounting for the remaining species within a plant community. Using both simulated and real-world data, we then demonstrate the process of applying the codominance metric to compare communities and to generate a quantitatively defensible subset of species to consider codominant within a community. We show that our metric effectively distinguishes the degree of codominance between four types of grassland ecosystems as well as simulated ecosystems with varying degrees of abundance sharing among community members. Overall, we make the case that increased research focusses on the conditions under which codominance occurs and the consequences for species coexistence, community structure and ecosystem function that would considerably advance the fields of community and ecosystem ecology.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/nph.17253}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.17253}, author = {Gray, J.E. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and M.D. Smith} } @article {5968, title = {Determinants of community compositional change are equally affected by global change}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {24}, year = {2021}, pages = {1892-1904}, abstract = {

Global change is impacting plant community composition, but the mechanisms underlying these changes are unclear. Using a dataset of 58 global change experiments, we tested the five fundamental mechanisms of community change: changes in evenness and richness, reordering, species gains and losses. We found 71\% of communities were impacted by global change treatments, and 88\% of communities that were exposed to two or more global change drivers were impacted. Further, all mechanisms of change were equally likely to be affected by global change treatments\—species losses and changes in richness were just as common as species gains and reordering. We also found no evidence of a progression of community changes, for example, reordering and changes in evenness did not precede species gains and losses. We demonstrate that all processes underlying plant community composition changes are equally affected by treatments and often occur simultaneously, necessitating a wholistic approach to quantifying community changes.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/ele.13824}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.13824}, author = {M.L. Avolio and Kimberly J. Komatsu and S.L Collins and Grman, Emily and Koerner, S.E. and Tredennick, A.T. and Wilcox, K.R. and Baer, S.G. and E.H. Boughton and Britton, Andrea J. and Foster, Bryan and Gough, Laura and Hovenden, Mark and Isbell, Forest and Jentsch, Anke and Johnson, David S. and Knapp, Alan K. and Kreyling, Juergen and Langley, J. Adam and Lortie, Christopher and McCulley, Rebecca L. and McLaren, Jennie R. and Reich, Peter B. and Seabloom, Eric W. and Smith, Melinda D. and Suding, Katharine N. and Suttle, K. Blake and Tognetti, Pedro M.}, editor = {Anderson, Marti} } @article {KNZ002041, title = {Increasing effects of chronic nutrient enrichment on plant diversity loss and ecosystem productivity over time}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {102}, year = {2021}, pages = {e03218}, abstract = {

Human activities are enriching many of Earth\’s ecosystems with biologically limiting mineral nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). In grasslands, this enrichment generally reduces plant diversity and increases productivity. The widely demonstrated positive effect of diversity on productivity suggests a potential negative feedback, whereby nutrient-induced declines in diversity reduce the initial gains in productivity arising from nutrient enrichment. In addition, plant productivity and diversity can be inhibited by accumulations of dead biomass, which may be altered by nutrient enrichment. Over longer timeframes, nutrient addition may increase soil fertility by increasing soil organic matter and nutrient pools. We examined the effects of 5-11 years of nutrient addition at 47 grasslands in twelve countries. Nutrient enrichment increased aboveground live biomass and reduced plant diversity at nearly all sites, and these effects became stronger over time. We did not find evidence that nutrient-induced losses of diversity reduced the positive effects of nutrients on biomass, however nutrient effects on live biomass increased more slowly at sites where litter was also increasing, regardless of plant diversity. This work suggests that short-term experiments may underestimate the long-term nutrient enrichment effects on global, grassland ecosystems.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1002/ecy.3218}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.3218}, author = {Seabloom, E.W. and Adler, P.B. and Alberti, J. and Biederman, L. and Buckley, Y.M. and Cadotte, M.W. and S.L Collins and Dee, L. and Fay, P.A. and Firn, J. and Hagenah, N. and Harpole, W. S. and Hautier, Y. and Hector, A. and Hobbie, S.E. and Isbell, F. and Knops, J.M.H. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Laungani, R. and MacDougall, A. and McCulley, R.L. and Moore, J.L. and Morgan, J.W. and Ohlert, T. and Prober, S.M. and Risch, A.C. and Schuetz, M. and Stevens, C.J. and Borer, E.T.} } @article {5970, title = {Negative effects of nitrogen override positive effects of phosphorus on grassland legumes worldwide}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, volume = {118}, year = {2021}, pages = {e2023718118}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2023718118}, url = {http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.2023718118}, author = {Tognetti, Pedro M. and Prober, Suzanne M. and B{\'a}ez, Selene and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Firn, Jennifer and Risch, Anita C. and Schuetz, Martin and Simonsen, Anna K. and Yahdjian, Laura and Borer, Elizabeth T. and Seabloom, Eric W. and Arnillas, Carlos Alberto and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Brown, Cynthia S. and Cadotte, Marc W. and Caldeira, Maria C. and Daleo, Pedro and Dwyer, John M. and Fay, Philip A. and Gherardi, Laureano A. and Hagenah, Nicole and Hautier, Yann and Kimberly J. Komatsu and McCulley, Rebecca L. and Price, Jodi N. and Standish, Rachel J. and Stevens, Carly J. and Wragg, Peter D. and Sankaran, Mahesh} } @article {6115, title = {Temporal rarity is a better predictor of local extinction risk than spatial rarity}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {102}, year = {2021}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1002/ecy.3504}, url = {https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ecy.3504}, author = {Wilfahrt, Peter A. and Asmus, Ashley L. and Seabloom, Eric W. and Henning, Jeremiah A. and Adler, Peter and Arnillas, Carlos A. and Bakker, Jonathan D. and Biederman, Lori and Brudvig, Lars A. and Cadotte, Marc and Daleo, Pedro and Eskelinen, Anu and Firn, Jennifer and Harpole, W. Stanley and Hautier, Yann and Kirkman, K.P. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Laungani, Ramesh and MacDougall, Andrew and McCulley, Rebecca L. and Moore, Joslin L. and Morgan, John W. and Mortensen, Brent and Ochoa Hueso, Raul and Ohlert, Timothy and Power, Sally A. and Price, Jodi and Risch, Anita C. and Schuetz, Martin and Shoemaker, Lauren and Stevens, Carly and Strauss, Alexander T. and Tognetti, Pedro M. and Virtanen, Risto and Borer, Elizabeth T.} } @article {KNZ002025, title = {Effects of white-tailed deer exclusion on the plant community composition of an upland tallgrass prairie ecosystem}, journal = {Journal of Vegetation Science}, volume = {31}, year = {2020}, pages = {899-907}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/jvs.12910}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jvs.12910}, author = {Bloodworth, K.J. and Ritchie, M.E. and Kimberly J. Komatsu} } @article {KNZ002001, title = {Mass ratio effects underlie ecosystem responses to environmental change}, journal = {Journal of Ecology}, volume = {108}, year = {2020}, pages = {855-864}, abstract = {

1. Random species loss has been shown experimentally to reduce ecosystem function, sometimes more than other anthropogenic environmental changes. Yet, controversy surrounds the importance of this finding for natural systems where species loss is non-random.
2. We compiled data from 16 multi-year experiments located at a single native tallgrass prairie site. These experiments included responses to 11 anthropogenic environmental changes, as well as non-random biodiversity loss either the removal of uncommon/rare plant species or the most common (dominant) species.
3. As predicted by the mass ratio hypothesis, loss of a dominant species had large impacts on productivity that were comparable to other anthropogenic drivers. In contrast, the loss of uncommon/rare species had small effects on productivity despite having the largest effects on species richness.
4. The anthropogenic drivers that had the largest effects on productivity nitrogen, irrigation, and fire experienced not only loss of species but also significant changes in the abundance and identity of dominant species.
5. Synthesis. These results suggest that mass ratio effects, rather than species loss per se, are an important determinant of ecosystem function with environmental change.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/1365-2745.13330}, url = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1365-2745.13330}, author = {M.D. Smith and Koerner, S.E. and Alan K. Knapp and M.L. Avolio and Chaves, F.A. and Denton, E.M. and Dietrich, J. and Gibson, D.J. and Gray, J. and Hoffman, A.M. and Hoover, D.L. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Silletti, A. and K.R. Wilcox and Yu, Q. and John M. Blair} } @article {KNZ002042, title = {Nutrients cause grassland biomass to outpace herbivory}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {11}, year = {2020}, pages = {6036}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-020-19870-y}, url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19870-y}, author = {Borer, E. T. and Harpole, W. S. and Adler, P. B. and Arnillas, C. A. and Bugalho, M. N. and Cadotte, M. W. and Caldeira, M. C. and Campana, S. and Dickman, C. R. and Dickson, T. L. and Donohue, I. and Eskelinen, A. and Firn, J. L. and Graff, P. and Gruner, D. S. and Heckman, R. W. and Koltz, A. M. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Lannes, L. S. and MacDougall, A. S. and Martina, J. P. and Moore, J. L. and Mortensen, B. and Ochoa-Hueso, R. and Olde Venterink, H. and Power, S. A. and Price, J. N. and Risch, A. C. and Sankaran, M. and sch{\"u}tz, M. and Sitters, J. and Stevens, C. J. and Virtanen, R. and Wilfahrt, P. A. and Seabloom, E. W.} } @article {KNZ001953, title = {A comprehensive approach to analyzing community dynamics using rank abundance curves}, journal = {Ecosphere}, volume = {10}, year = {2019}, pages = {e02881}, abstract = {

Univariate and multivariate methods are commonly used to explore the spatial and temporaldynamics of ecological communities, but each has limitations, including oversimplification or abstractionof communities. Rank abundance curves (RACs) potentially integrate these existing methodologies bydetailing species-level community changes. Here, we had three goals:first, to simplify analysis of commu-nity dynamics by developing a coordinated set of R functions, and second, to demystify the relationshipsamong univariate, multivariate, and RACs measures, and examine how each is influenced by the commu-nity parameters as well as data collection methods. We developed new functions for studying temporalchanges and spatial differences in RACs in an update to the R package library(\“codyn\”), alongside othernew functions to calculate univariate and multivariate measures of community dynamics. We also devel-oped a new approach to studying changes in the shape of RAC curves. The R package update presentedhere increases the accessibility of univariate and multivariate measures of community change over timeand difference over space. Next, we use simulated and real data to assess the RAC and multivariate mea-sures that are output from our new functions, studying (1) if they are influenced by species richness andevenness, temporal turnover, and spatial variability and (2) how the measures are related to each other.Lastly, we explore the use of the measures with an example from a long-term nutrient addition experiment.Wefind that the RAC and multivariate measures are not sensitive to species richness and evenness andthat all the measures detail unique aspects of temporal change or spatial differences. We alsofind that spe-cies reordering is the strongest correlate of a multivariate measure of compositional change and explainsmost community change observed in long-term nutrient addition experiment. Overall, we show that spe-cies reordering is potentially an understudied determinant of community changes over time or differencesbetween treatments. The functions developed here should enhance the use of RACs to further explore thedynamics of ecological communities.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1002/ecs2.2881}, url = {https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.2881}, author = {M.L. Avolio and Carroll, I. and Scott. L. Collins and Houseman, Gregory R. and Hallett, L.M. and Isbell, F.L. and Koerner, S.E. and Kimberly J. Komatsu and M.D. Smith and K.R. Wilcox} } @article {KNZ001958, title = {Effects of nutrient supply, herbivory, and host community on fungal endophyte diversity}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {100}, year = {2019}, pages = {e02758}, abstract = {

The microbes contained within free-living organisms can alter host growth, reproduction, and interactions with the environment. In turn, processes occurring at larger scales determine the local biotic and abiotic environment of each host that may affect the diversity and composition of the microbiome community. Here, we examine variation in the diversity and composition of the foliar fungal microbiome in the grass host, Andropogon gerardii, across four mesic prairies in the central United States. Composition of fungal endophyte communities differed among sites and among individuals within a site, but was not consistently affected by experimental manipulation of nutrient supply to hosts (A. gerardii) or herbivore reduction via fencing. In contrast, mean fungal diversity was similar among sites but was limited by total plant biomass at the plot scale. Our work demonstrates that distributed experiments motivated by ecological theory are a powerful tool to unravel the multiscale processes governing microbial community composition and diversity.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1002/ecy.2758}, url = {https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ecy.2758}, author = {Seabloom, Eric W. and Condon, Bradford and Kinkel, Linda and Kimberly J. Komatsu and Lumibao, Candice Y. and May, Georgiana and McCulley, Rebecca L. and E.T. Borer} } @article {KNZ001965, title = {Global change effects on plant communities are magnified by time and the number of global change factors imposed}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, volume = {116}, year = {2019}, pages = {17867-17873}, abstract = {

Global change drivers (GCDs) are expected to alter community structure and consequently, the services that ecosystems provide. Yet, few experimental investigations have examined effects of GCDs on plant community structure across multiple ecosystem types, and those that do exist present conflicting patterns. In an unprecedented global synthesis of over 100 experiments that manipulated factors linked to GCDs, we show that herbaceous plant community responses depend on experimental manipulation length and number of factors manipulated. We found that plant communities are fairly resistant to experimentally manipulated GCDs in the short term (\<10 y). In contrast, long-term (\≥10 y) experiments show increasing community divergence of treatments from control conditions. Surprisingly, these community responses occurred with similar frequency across the GCD types manipulated in our database. However, community responses were more common when 3 or more GCDs were simultaneously manipulated, suggesting the emergence of additive or synergistic effects of multiple drivers, particularly over long time periods. In half of the cases, GCD manipulations caused a difference in community composition without a corresponding species richness difference, indicating that species reordering or replacement is an important mechanism of community responses to GCDs and should be given greater consideration when examining consequences of GCDs for the biodiversity\–ecosystem function relationship. Human activities are currently driving unparalleled global changes worldwide. Our analyses provide the most comprehensive evidence to date that these human activities may have widespread impacts on plant community composition globally, which will increase in frequency over time and be greater in areas where communities face multiple GCDs simultaneously.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1819027116}, url = {https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/08/14/1819027116}, author = {Kimberly J. Komatsu and M.L. Avolio and Lemoine, Nathan P. and Isbell, Forest and Grman, Emily and Houseman, Gregory R. and Koerner, Sally E. and Johnson, D.S. and K.R. Wilcox and Juha M. Alatalo and Anderson, J.P. and Aerts, R. and S.G. Baer and Baldwin, Andrew H. and Bates, J. and Beierkuhnlein, C. and Belote, R.T. and John M. Blair and Bloor, J.M.G. and Bohlen, P.J. and Edward W. Bork and Elizabeth H. Boughton and W.D. Bowman and Britton, Andrea J. and Cahill, James F. and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Chiariello, N.R. and Cheng, Jimin. and Scott. L. Collins and Cornelissen, J.H.C. and G. Du and Eskelinen, Anu and Firn, Jennifer and Foster, B. and Gough, L. and Gross, K. and Hallett, L.M. and Han, X. and Harmens, H. and Hovenden, M.J. and Jagerbrand, A. and Jentsch, A. and Kern, Christel and Klanderud, Kari and Alan K. Knapp and Kreyling, Juergen and Li, W. and Luo, Yiqi and McCulley, R.L. and McLaren, Jennie R. and Megonigal, Patrick and J.W. Morgan and Onipchenko, Vladimir and Pennings, S.C. and Prev{\'e}y, J.S. and Price, Jodi N. and P.B. Reich and Robinson, Clare H. and Russell, L.F. and Sala, O.E. and Seabloom, E.W. and M.D. Smith and Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A. and Souza, Lara and K.N. Suding and Suttle, B.K. and Svejcar, T. and Tilman, David and Tognetti, P. and Turkington, R. and White, S. and Xu, Zhuwen and Yahdjian, L. and Yu, Q. and Zhang, Pengfei and Zhang, Yunhai} }