01848nas a2200133   4500008004100000245008800041210006900129300001500198490000700213520134400220100001901564700001801583856011301601       1995                        eng d00aTravel path characteristics for free-living white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus)0 aTravel path characteristics for freeliving whitefooted mice Pero  a1474 -14780 v733 aCharacteristics of the travel paths of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) were examined by tracking animals marked with fluorescent pigment in a wooded site in northeastern Kansas. Based on 84 trails made by 49 individuals, it was concluded that tops of structural features (rocks, branches, logs, or rock fence) were selectively used for nighttime travel. Trails averaged 41.7% structural features (SE = 6.0%), whereas sample points 20 cm away from trails averaged 18.0% structural features (SE = 1.8%). This pattern of use of structural features did not differ between male and female mice. Nighttime illumination (according to the moon phase) and season did not affect the proportion of structural features used along travel paths; this suggests that risk from visual predators was not driving the pattern of use of structural features for travel paths by white-footed mice. Rather, white-footed mice may have used surface structure for travel because structural features provide paths that are more easily traveled and remembered. Trees were climbed infrequently (0.6 trees per 100 m of trail), but more in autumn (1.9 trees per 100 m of trail) than in other seasons (0.2 trees per 100 m of trail), which likely resulted from greater availability of seeds, nuts, and fruits during autumn than during other seasons.1 aMcMillan, B.R.1 aKaufman, D.W.  uhttp://knz.lternet.edu/content/travel-path-characteristics-free-living-white-footed-mice-peromyscus-leucopus