02795nas a2200157   4500008004100000245007700041210006900118300001400187490000800201520225600209100002302465700002602488700002802514700002302542856007202565       2019                        eng d00aPhenology-adjusted dynamic curve number for improved hydrologic modeling0 aPhenologyadjusted dynamic curve number for improved hydrologic m  a403 - 4130 v2353 a<p>The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN, or CN) is a widely used method to estimate runoff from rainfall events. It has been adapted to many parts of the world with different land uses, land cover types, and climatic conditions and successfully applied to situations ranging from simple runoff calculations and land use change assessment to comprehensive hydrologic/water quality simulations. However, the CN method lacks the ability to incorporate seasonal variations in vegetated surface conditions, and unnoticed landuse/landcover (LULC) change that shape infiltration and storm runoff. Plant phenology is a main determinant of changes in hydrologic processes and water balances across seasons through its influence on surface roughness and evapotranspiration. This study used regression analysis to develop a dynamic CN (CNNDVI) based on seasonal variations in the remotely-sensed Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to monitor intra-annual plant phenological development. A time series of 16-day MODIS NDVI (MOD13Q1 Collection 5) images were used to monitor vegetation development and provide NDVI data necessary for CNNDVI model calibration and validation. Twelve years of rainfall and runoff data (2001&ndash;2012) from four small watersheds located in the Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas were used to develop, calibrate, and validate the method. Results showed CNNDVI performed significantly better in predicting runoff with calibrated CNNDVI runoff increasing by approximately 0.74 for every unit increase in observed runoff compared to 0.46 for SCS-CN runoff and was more highly correlated to observed runoff (r = 0.78 vs. r = 0.38). In addition, CNNDVI runoff had better NSE (0.53) and PBIAS (4.22) compared to the SCS-CN runoff (&minus;0.87 and &minus;94.86 respectively). In the validated model, CNNDVI runoff increased by approximately 0.96 for every unit of observed runoff, while SCS-CN runoff increased by 0.49. Validated runoff was also better correlated to observed runoff than SCS-CN runoff (r=0.52 vs. r=0.33). These findings suggest that the CNNDVI can yield improved estimates of surface runoff from precipitation events, leading to more informed water and land management decisions.</p>1 aMuche, Muluken, E.1 aHutchinson, Stacy, L.1 aHutchinson, J.M., Shawn1 aJohnston, John, M.  uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479718315433